These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39083799)
1. Reference Hallucination Score for Medical Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Development and Usability Study. Aljamaan F; Temsah MH; Altamimi I; Al-Eyadhy A; Jamal A; Alhasan K; Mesallam TA; Farahat M; Malki KH JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Jul; 12():e54345. PubMed ID: 39083799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware. Carlson JA; Cheng RZ; Lange A; Nagalakshmi N; Rabets J; Shah T; Sindhwani P Cureus; 2024 Aug; 16(8):e67996. PubMed ID: 39347335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures. Yalla GR; Hyman N; Hock LE; Zhang Q; Shukla AG; Kolomeyer NN Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56766. PubMed ID: 38650824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of ChatGPT®, BARD®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity® responses on palliative care. Hancı V; Ergün B; Gül Ş; Uzun Ö; Erdemir İ; Hancı FB Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Aug; 103(33):e39305. PubMed ID: 39151545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study. Hansen S; Brandt CJ; Søndergaard J JMIR AI; 2024 Jan; 3():e49082. PubMed ID: 38875597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Top Searched Queries About Cancer. Pan A; Musheyev D; Bockelman D; Loeb S; Kabarriti AE JAMA Oncol; 2023 Oct; 9(10):1437-1440. PubMed ID: 37615960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence chatbot recommendations for urolithiasis management: A study of EAU guideline compliance. Altıntaş E; Ozkent MS; Gül M; Batur AF; Kaynar M; Kılıç Ö; Göktaş S Fr J Urol; 2024 Jul; 34(7-8):102666. PubMed ID: 38849035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and Comparison of Ophthalmic Scientific Abstracts and References by Current Artificial Intelligence Chatbots. Hua HU; Kaakour AH; Rachitskaya A; Srivastava S; Sharma S; Mammo DA JAMA Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 141(9):819-824. PubMed ID: 37498609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the Possible Use of AI Chatbots in Public Health Education: Feasibility Study. Baglivo F; De Angelis L; Casigliani V; Arzilli G; Privitera GP; Rizzo C JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Nov; 9():e51421. PubMed ID: 37910155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of ChatGPT-4 and Bard chatbots in responding to common patient questions on prostate cancer Belge Bilgin G; Bilgin C; Childs DS; Orme JJ; Burkett BJ; Packard AT; Johnson DR; Thorpe MP; Riaz IB; Halfdanarson TR; Johnson GB; Sartor O; Kendi AT Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1386718. PubMed ID: 39070149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Talking technology: exploring chatbots as a tool for cataract patient education. Yılmaz IBE; Doğan L Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Jan; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38194585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Charting new AI education in gastroenterology: Cross-sectional evaluation of ChatGPT and perplexity AI in medical residency exam. Gravina AG; Pellegrino R; Palladino G; Imperio G; Ventura A; Federico A Dig Liver Dis; 2024 Aug; 56(8):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 38503659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of AI Chats to Determine an Emergency: A Comparison Between OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing AI Chat. Zúñiga Salazar G; Zúñiga D; Vindel CL; Yoong AM; Hincapie S; Zúñiga AB; Zúñiga P; Salazar E; Zúñiga B Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45473. PubMed ID: 37727841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias and Inaccuracy in AI Chatbot Ophthalmologist Recommendations. Oca MC; Meller L; Wilson K; Parikh AO; McCoy A; Chang J; Sudharshan R; Gupta S; Zhang-Nunes S Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45911. PubMed ID: 37885556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The performance of artificial intelligence chatbot large language models to address skeletal biology and bone health queries. Cung M; Sosa B; Yang HS; McDonald MM; Matthews BG; Vlug AG; Imel EA; Wein MN; Stein EM; Greenblatt MB J Bone Miner Res; 2024 Mar; 39(2):106-115. PubMed ID: 38477743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the performance of artificial intelligence learning models to medical students in solving histology and embryology multiple choice questions. Bajčetić M; Mirčić A; Rakočević J; Đoković D; Milutinović K; Zaletel I Ann Anat; 2024 Jun; 254():152261. PubMed ID: 38521363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriateness of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management. Shiraishi M; Lee H; Kanayama K; Moriwaki Y; Okazaki M Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2024 Feb; ():15347346241236811. PubMed ID: 38419470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of AI chatbots on controversial topics in oral medicine, pathology, and radiology. Mohammad-Rahimi H; Khoury ZH; Alamdari MI; Rokhshad R; Motie P; Parsa A; Tavares T; Sciubba JJ; Price JB; Sultan AS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 May; 137(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 38553304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5 and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice Questions. Sallam M; Al-Salahat K; Eid H; Egger J; Puladi B Adv Med Educ Pract; 2024; 15():857-871. PubMed ID: 39319062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing AI, and Bard Against Conventional Drug-Drug Interactions Clinical Tools. Al-Ashwal FY; Zawiah M; Gharaibeh L; Abu-Farha R; Bitar AN Drug Healthc Patient Saf; 2023; 15():137-147. PubMed ID: 37750052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]