These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39086432)

  • 1. Anticipation (second-order motor planning) is stored in memory - processing of grasp postures in a priming paradigm.
    Kämpfer J; Vogel L; Schack T
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1393254. PubMed ID: 39086432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Dec; 101():12-6. PubMed ID: 26544603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect.
    Löhr-Limpens M; Göhringer F; Schenk T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103637. PubMed ID: 35690027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of time constraints on posture choices during an end-state comfort task.
    Modersitzki R; Studenka BE
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102618. PubMed ID: 32452435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 22075763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. End-state comfort trumps handedness in object manipulation.
    Coelho CJ; Studenka BE; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):718-30. PubMed ID: 24294873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Spiegel MA; Oehmichen C; Hammes J; Schack T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43015. PubMed ID: 22970119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice of end-state comfort is dependent upon the time spent at the beginning-state and the precision requirement of the end-state.
    Studenka BE; Gamble TG; Hernandez-Zuniga J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Aug; 90():103112. PubMed ID: 37290227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grip selection without tool knowledge: end-state comfort effect in familiar and novel tool use.
    Baumard J; De Sousa E; Roy V; Deschamps L; Iodice P; Osiurak F; Brisson J
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Aug; 241(8):1989-2000. PubMed ID: 37382668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habit outweighs planning in grasp selection for object manipulation.
    Herbort O; Mathew H; Kunde W
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Feb; 92():127-140. PubMed ID: 27951435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coordinating Initial and Final Action Goals in Planning Grasp-to-Rotate Movements: An ERP Study.
    Yu L; Schack T; Koester D
    Neuroscience; 2021 Apr; 459():70-84. PubMed ID: 33548368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuomotor priming of action preparation and motor programming is similar in visually guided and memory-guided actions.
    Seegelke C; Güldenpenning I; Dettling J; Schack T
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():1-8. PubMed ID: 27477631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expertise affects representation structure and categorical activation of grasp postures in climbing.
    Bläsing BE; Güldenpenning I; Koester D; Schack T
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1008. PubMed ID: 25309480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Second-order grasp planning reflects sensitivity to inertial factors.
    Wagman JB; Abney DH; Rosenbaum DA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():451-460. PubMed ID: 29074308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of grasping habits and object orientation on motor planning in children and adults.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Dec; 59(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 29071707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finger control in the tripod grasp.
    Gentilucci M; Caselli L; Secchi C
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 12632237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool-object perception.
    Natraj N; Poole V; Mizelle JC; Flumini A; Borghi AM; Wheaton LA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):506-19. PubMed ID: 23261936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.