These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39089059)

  • 1. 'Low' LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software.
    McCarthy-Allen M; Bleka Ø; Ypma R; Gill P; Benschop C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Nov; 73():103099. PubMed ID: 39089059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
    Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
    Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNAxs/DNAStatistX: Development and validation of a software suite for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles.
    Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Hovers P; Slagter M; Kruise D; Parag R; Steensma K; Slooten K; Nagel JHA; Dieltjes P; van Marion V; van Paassen H; de Jong J; Creeten C; Sijen T; Kneppers ALJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():81-89. PubMed ID: 31254947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tale of two PG systems: A comparison of the two most widely used continuous probabilistic genotyping systems in the United States.
    Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1840-1860. PubMed ID: 38899548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.
    Bright JA; Cheng K; Kerr Z; McGovern C; Kelly H; Moretti TR; Smith MA; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Coble MD; Alghafri R; Allen PS; Barber A; Beamer V; Buettner C; Russell M; Gehrig C; Hicks T; Charak J; Cheong-Wing K; Ciecko A; Davis CT; Donley M; Pedersen N; Gartside B; Granger D; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Reisinger E; Kennedy J; Grammer E; Kaplan M; Hansen D; Larsen HJ; Laureano A; Li C; Lien E; Lindberg E; Kelly C; Mallinder B; Malsom S; Yacovone-Margetts A; McWhorter A; Prajapati SM; Powell T; Shutler G; Stevenson K; Stonehouse AR; Smith L; Murakami J; Halsing E; Wright D; Clark L; Taylor DA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():1-8. PubMed ID: 30665115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
    Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
    Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
    Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
    Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV.
    Vergeer P; van Schaik Y; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110722. PubMed ID: 33684845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
    Huffman K; Ballantyne J
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ProbRank: An efficient DNA database search method for complex mixtures per a quantitative likelihood ratio model.
    Hoogenboom J; Sijen T; Benschop C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102884. PubMed ID: 37150077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-laboratory validation of DNAxs including the statistical library DNAStatistX.
    Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Bargeman F; Hovers P; Slagter M; van der Linden J; Parag R; Kruise D; Drobnic K; Klucevsek G; Parson W; Berger B; Laurent FX; Faivre M; Ulus A; Schneider P; Bogus M; Kneppers ALJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102390. PubMed ID: 32937255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
    Thompson WC
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
    McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.