These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39092520)
1. The Impact of Information Relevancy and Interactivity on Intensivists' Trust in a Machine Learning-Based Bacteremia Prediction System: Simulation Study. Katzburg O; Roimi M; Frenkel A; Ilan R; Bitan Y JMIR Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 11():e56924. PubMed ID: 39092520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Advanced Machine Learning Model for a Web-Based Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support System Application: Model Development and Validation Study. Lin TH; Chung HY; Jian MJ; Chang CK; Perng CL; Liao GS; Yu JC; Dai MS; Yu CP; Shang HS J Med Internet Res; 2024 Sep; 26():e56022. PubMed ID: 39231422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information. McGuirl JM; Sarter NB Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):656-65. PubMed ID: 17240714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Vision on User-Centered Implementation and Evaluation of Explainable AI for Predicting Hospital-Onset Bacteremia. Hoogestraat AT; Wulff A Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Aug; 316():766-770. PubMed ID: 39176906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Mobile App That Addresses Interpretability Challenges in Machine Learning-Based Diabetes Predictions: Survey-Based User Study. Hendawi R; Li J; Roy S JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e50328. PubMed ID: 37955948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trust criteria for artificial intelligence in health: normative and epistemic considerations. Kostick-Quenet K; Lang BH; Smith J; Hurley M; Blumenthal-Barby J J Med Ethics; 2024 Jul; 50(8):544-551. PubMed ID: 37979976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Machine Learning Approach with Human-AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Patient Safety Event Reports: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. Chen H; Cohen E; Wilson D; Alfred M JMIR Hum Factors; 2024 Jan; 11():e53378. PubMed ID: 38271086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis. Choudhury A; Shamszare H JMIR Hum Factors; 2024 May; 11():e55399. PubMed ID: 38801658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study. Hwang J; Lee T; Lee H; Byun S J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28659. PubMed ID: 35044311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Rovira E; McGarry K; Parasuraman R Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 17315845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OrderRex clinical user testing: a randomized trial of recommender system decision support on simulated cases. Kumar A; Aikens RC; Hom J; Shieh L; Chiang J; Morales D; Saini D; Musen M; Baiocchi M; Altman R; Goldstein MK; Asch S; Chen JH J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Dec; 27(12):1850-1859. PubMed ID: 33106874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction of Medical Professionals With Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review. Knop M; Weber S; Mueller M; Niehaves B JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 9(1):e28639. PubMed ID: 35323118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating Explainable Machine Learning in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Study Involving a Modified Design Thinking Approach. Shulha M; Hovdebo J; D'Souza V; Thibault F; Harmouche R JMIR Form Res; 2024 Apr; 8():e50475. PubMed ID: 38625728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trust in AI: why we should be designing for APPROPRIATE reliance. Benda NC; Novak LL; Reale C; Ancker JS J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Dec; 29(1):207-212. PubMed ID: 34725693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of patient choice tendency in medical decision-making based on machine learning algorithm. Lyu Y; Xu Q; Yang Z; Liu J Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1087358. PubMed ID: 36908484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design, implementation, and evaluation of the computer-aided clinical decision support system based on learning-to-rank: collaboration between physicians and machine learning in the differential diagnosis process. Miyachi Y; Ishii O; Torigoe K BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Feb; 23(1):26. PubMed ID: 36732730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A qualitative research framework for the design of user-centered displays of explanations for machine learning model predictions in healthcare. Barda AJ; Horvat CM; Hochheiser H BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Oct; 20(1):257. PubMed ID: 33032582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More Is Not Always Better: Impacts of AI-Generated Confidence and Explanations in Human-Automation Interaction. Ling S; Zhang Y; Du N Hum Factors; 2024 Dec; 66(12):2606-2620. PubMed ID: 38437598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Merritt SM; Ilgen DR Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]