These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3909600)

  • 41. Computer simulations of speckle in B-scan images.
    Foster DR; Arditi M; Foster FS; Patterson MS; Hunt JW
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Oct; 5(4):308-30. PubMed ID: 6686898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Single-element focused ultrasound transducer method for harmonic motion imaging.
    Maleke C; Pernot M; Konofagou EE
    Ultrason Imaging; 2006 Jul; 28(3):144-58. PubMed ID: 17147056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optimization of the lateral resolution of a transducer.
    Salomonsson G; Mandersson B
    Ultrason Imaging; 1987 Jul; 9(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 3445401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Specular reflector noise: effect and correction for in vivo attenuation estimation.
    Laugier P; Berger G; Fink M; Perrin J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Oct; 7(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 3914769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Correction of diffraction errors in attenuation estimation with Dynamic Beam Translation.
    Céspedes I; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 1580017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modeling and computer simulation of ultrasound imaging systems and human tissues.
    Lee BS; Park SB
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Oct; 10(4):229-47. PubMed ID: 3074548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measurement of thermal diffusivity of biomaterials by focused ultrasonic beams (thermal pulse decay method by focused ultrasonic beams).
    Nakayama M; Tanishita K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 7920196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Investigation of a model for estimating the attenuation of ultrasonic signals.
    Salomonsson G; Claesson I; Holmer NG
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1984 Nov; 22(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 6390011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Precision and accuracy of acoustospectrographic parameters.
    Huisman HJ; Thijssen JM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(7):855-71. PubMed ID: 8923705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fabrication of an optical lens array using ultraviolet light and ultrasonication.
    Taniguchi S; Koyama D; Nakamura K; Matsukawa M
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():22-6. PubMed ID: 25497498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Correlation artifacts in speed of sound estimation in scattering media.
    Ophir J; Johnson W; Yazdi Y; Shattuck D; Mehta D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 2763385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors.
    Yao LX; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Jan; 12(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 2184569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Elimination of diffraction error in acoustic attenuation estimation via axial beam translation.
    Ophir J; Mehta D
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 3057713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Statistical relationship between ultrasound echo envelope and envelope peak.
    He P
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Oct; 10(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 3074550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The ultrasonic transducer.
    Kossoff G
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1969; 9(3):523-41. PubMed ID: 5396771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimation of acoustic attenuation in liver using one megabyte of data and the zero-crossings technique.
    Duerinckx AJ; Ferrari LA; Hoefs JC; Sankar PV; Fleming D; Cole-Bueglet C
    Ultrasonics; 1986 Nov; 24(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 3535199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimation of scatterer volume density near a concentration gradient.
    Newhouse VL; Amir I
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Apr; 7(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 4082375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prediction of in situ exposure to ultrasound: an improved method.
    Bacon DR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 2763386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rapid evaluation of many pulse echo system characteristics by use of a triggered pulse burst generator with exponential decay.
    Carson PL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1976 Aug; 4(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 820719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Attenuation measurement uncertainties caused by speckle statistics.
    Parker KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 3531278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.