These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39096042)

  • 1. The dimer effect: A refinement approach towards skin sensitization assessment in-chemico using Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay.
    Paul Choudhury R; Singh A; Mathai E; Sudhakar D; Tourneix F; Alépée N; Gautier F
    J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Nov; 44(11):1804-1815. PubMed ID: 39096042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cause of and countermeasures for oxidation of the cysteine-derived reagent used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Sugawara T; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kurokawa Y; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Kojima H; Ono A; Katsuoka Y; Tanabe H; Yokoyama H; Kasahara T
    J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 30221369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of in chemico skin sensitization methods and development of an in chemico skin photosensitization assay.
    Patel NH; Mishra PK; Nagane R; Deshpande A; Tamboli IY; Date R
    ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):373-387. PubMed ID: 30865783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a prediction method for skin sensitization using novel cysteine and lysine derivatives.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2014; 70(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 24928155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay (4 mM) for the prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
    Imamura M; Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Nakashima N; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jul; 42(7):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 34993977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oxidation of a cysteine-derived nucleophilic reagent by dimethyl sulfoxide in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.
    Akimoto M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kamiya K; Kojima K; Kawakami T; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 40(6):843-854. PubMed ID: 32052484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving predictive capacity of the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay test method for skin sensitization potential with an optimal molar concentration of test chemical solution.
    Imamura M; Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 41(2):303-329. PubMed ID: 33124715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions.
    Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Usami R; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1348-60. PubMed ID: 25809859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amino acid derivative reactivity assay-organic solvent reaction system: A novel alternative test for skin sensitization capable of assessing highly hydrophobic substances.
    Yamaga H; Watanabe S; Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Kasahara T; Kataoka S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Oct; 41(10):1634-1648. PubMed ID: 33636015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within- and between-laboratory reproducibility and predictive capacity of amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) using a 0.5 mg/mL test chemical solution: Results of the study for reproducibility confirmation implemented in five participating laboratories.
    Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Takeuchi K; Kamiya K; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1078-1090. PubMed ID: 35043433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In chemico assessment of potential sensitizers: Stability and direct peptide reactivity of 24 fragrance ingredients.
    Avonto C; Wang YH; Chittiboyina AG; Vukmanovic S; Khan IA
    J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):398-408. PubMed ID: 30325045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precipitation of test chemicals in reaction solutions used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay and the direct peptide reactivity assay.
    Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 100():106624. PubMed ID: 31445998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The within- and between-laboratory reproducibility and predictive capacity of the in chemico amino acid derivative reactivity assay: Results of validation study implemented in four participating laboratories.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Sugawara T; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kurokawa Y; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Nakayama T; Kusao T; Richmond J; Nicole K; Kim BH; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):1492-1505. PubMed ID: 31313332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A direct peptide reactivity assay using a high-throughput mass spectrometry screening platform for detection of skin sensitizers.
    Wei Z; Fang Y; Gosztyla ML; Li AJ; Huang W; LeClair CA; Simeonov A; Tao D; Xia M
    Toxicol Lett; 2021 Mar; 338():67-77. PubMed ID: 33290830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Off to a good start? Review of the predictivity of reactivity methods modelling the molecular initiating event of skin sensitization.
    Alépée N; Tourneix F; Singh A; Ade N; Grégoire S
    ALTEX; 2023; 40(4):606-618. PubMed ID: 37314401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. LC-MS-based characterization of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to improve the in vitro prediction of the skin sensitization potential.
    Natsch A; Gfeller H
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Dec; 106(2):464-78. PubMed ID: 18791182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theoretical Validation of
    Fujimoto K; Higaki T; Abe J; Fujita M; Kawakami T
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2022 Nov; 35(11):2107-2121. PubMed ID: 36315617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictivity of the kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) for sensitizer potency assessment and GHS subclassification.
    Natsch A; Haupt T; Wareing B; Landsiedel R; Kolle SN
    ALTEX; 2020; 37(4):652-664. PubMed ID: 32840629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay for prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
    Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Akimoto M; Katsuoka Y; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(9):585-600. PubMed ID: 31474740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In chemico skin sensitization alternative method: development of ADRA and listing to OECD test guideline].
    Kasahara T; Fujita M
    Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi; 2022; 157(5):345-350. PubMed ID: 36047150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.