These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3909753)

  • 1. Contrast media osmolality and plasma volume changes.
    Hine AL; Lui D; Dawson P
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(6):753-6. PubMed ID: 3909753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast media tonicity. Part I. Effects upon IV-DSA time-concentration curve peak and width: experimental studies.
    Burbank FH; Thompson WM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 3514540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate].
    Tajima H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography.
    Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haemodynamic side effects of meglumine ioglicate, meglumine sodium ioxaglate and iohexol in aortofemoral angiography: comparison of a high-osmolar and two low-osmolar radiological contrast media.
    Wiebe V; Straub H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():78-84. PubMed ID: 6139084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New contrast agents. Chemistry and pharmacology.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S293-300. PubMed ID: 6511274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intravenous urography with low-osmolality contrast agents: theoretical considerations and clinical findings.
    Dawson P; Heron C; Marshall J
    Clin Radiol; 1984 May; 35(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 6713791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Boylan L
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 7141831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AUR Memorial Award. Determinants of contrast enhancement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Burbank FH
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 6352557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast media.
    Grainger RG
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Aug; 53(632):739-46. PubMed ID: 7437683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic iodinated low-osmolar contrast media on platelet function with the PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer).
    D'Anglemont De Tassigny A; IDéE JM; Corot AC
    Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):276-82. PubMed ID: 11323515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of radiologic contrast media on cell volume regulation in rabbit proximal renal tubules.
    Galtung HK; Løken M; Sakariassen KS
    Acad Radiol; 2001 May; 8(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 11345270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
    Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Yegnashankaran S; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of radiologic contrast media on cell volume regulatory mechanisms in human red blood cells.
    Galtung HK; Sørlundsengen V; Sakariassen KS; Benestad HB
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):878-85. PubMed ID: 12186435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of contrast media of low osmolality on the peripheral arterial blood flow in the dog.
    Steiner RM; Grainger RG; Memon N; Weiss D; Kanofsky PB; Menduke H
    Clin Radiol; 1980 Nov; 31(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 7214800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.
    Dawson P; Hewitt P; Mackie IJ; Machin SJ; Amin S; Bradshaw A
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 3957598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW; Harnish PP; Reece K; Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Newer contrast agents for urography.
    Spataro RF
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1984 Jun; 22(2):365-80. PubMed ID: 6205415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trials in adults.
    Mathias K; Seemann W
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):44-6. PubMed ID: 3523640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.