These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39103675)
1. Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses. Mirzayeh Fashami F; Tarride JE; Sadeghirad B; Hariri K; Peyrovinasab A; Levine M Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 Nov; 8(6):823-836. PubMed ID: 39103675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Publisher Correction: Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison Between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses. Mirzayeh Fashami F; Tarride JE; Sadeghirad B; Hariri K; Peyrovinasab A; Levine M Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 Nov; 8(6):963-965. PubMed ID: 39287921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Joshy J; Rawson NS J Comp Eff Res; 2024 May; 13(5):e230178. PubMed ID: 38567953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health-related quality of life in oncology drug reimbursement submissions in Canada: A review of submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review. Raymakers AJN; Regier DA; Peacock SJ Cancer; 2020 Jan; 126(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 31544234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appraisals by Health Technology Assessment Agencies of Economic Evaluations Submitted as Part of Reimbursement Dossiers for Oncology Treatments: Evidence from Canada, the UK, and Australia. Ball G; Levine MAH; Thabane L; Tarride JE Curr Oncol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):7624-7636. PubMed ID: 36290879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review. Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Druyts E; Yan K; Desai K; Barakat S; Locklin J Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2020; 12():445-457. PubMed ID: 32922050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada. Rawson NSB; Stewart DJ Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2024; 16():437-445. PubMed ID: 38812711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment. Ontario Health (Quality) Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2021; 21(13):1-214. PubMed ID: 34484487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review. Meregaglia M; Nicod E; Drummond M Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Sep; 24(7):1151-1216. PubMed ID: 36335234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health technology assessment of drugs for rare diseases: insights, trends, and reasons for negative recommendations from the CADTH common drug review. Janoudi G; Amegatse W; McIntosh B; Sehgal C; Richter T Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(1):164. PubMed ID: 27908281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Manufacturer Submitted and Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Reanalysed Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for Novel Oncology Drugs. Saluja R; Jiao T; Koshy L; Cheung M; Chan KKW Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):606-618. PubMed ID: 33498460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cabozantinib and vandetanib for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and economic model. Tappenden P; Carroll C; Hamilton J; Kaltenthaler E; Wong R; Wadsley J; Moss L; Balasubramanian S Health Technol Assess; 2019 Feb; 23(8):1-144. PubMed ID: 30821231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits? Rawson NSB Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jun; 17(1):218. PubMed ID: 35698235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptance of health technology assessment submissions with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios above the cost-effectiveness threshold. Griffiths EA; Hendrich JK; Stoddart SD; Walsh SC Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 7():463-76. PubMed ID: 26366099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model. Fox M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Dean J; Stein K; Price A; Taylor RS Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. PubMed ID: 17999842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]