These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39104700)
21. Evaluating Cognitive Action Control Using Eye-Movement Analysis: An Oculomotor Adaptation of the Simon Task. Duprez J; Houvenaghel JF; Naudet F; Dondaine T; Auffret M; Robert G; Drapier D; Argaud S; Vérin M; Sauleau P Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():84. PubMed ID: 26973499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks. Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal dynamics of interference in Simon and Eriksen tasks considered within the context of a dual-process model. Mansfield KL; van der Molen MW; Falkenstein M; van Boxtel GJ Brain Cogn; 2013 Aug; 82(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23856129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Learned irrelevant stimulus-response associations and proportion congruency effect: A diffusion model account. Luo J; Yang M; Wang L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1218-1246. PubMed ID: 36006727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modeling the effects of methylphenidate on interference and evidence accumulation processes using the conflict linear ballistic accumulator. Weigard A; Heathcote A; Sripada C Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2501-2512. PubMed ID: 31302719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model. Miller J; Schwarz W Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):1776-1795. PubMed ID: 34327678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Linking Theoretical Decision-making Mechanisms in the Simon Task with Electrophysiological Data: A Model-based Neuroscience Study in Humans. Servant M; White C; Montagnini A; Burle B J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1501-21. PubMed ID: 27315275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conflict processing in kindergarten children: New evidence from distribution analyses reveals the dynamics of incorrect response activation and suppression. Ambrosi S; Servant M; Blaye A; Burle B J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jan; 177():36-52. PubMed ID: 30165290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters. Nunez MD; Vandekerckhove J; Srinivasan R J Math Psychol; 2017 Feb; 76(Pt B):117-130. PubMed ID: 28435173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Different eigenvalue distributions encode the same temporal tasks in recurrent neural networks. Jarne C Cogn Neurodyn; 2023 Feb; 17(1):257-275. PubMed ID: 35469119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Shared mechanisms underlying the location-, word- and arrow-based Simon effects. Luo C; Proctor RW Psychol Res; 2020 Sep; 84(6):1655-1667. PubMed ID: 30941493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol. Wagner B; Clos M; Sommer T; Peters J J Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 40(41):7936-7948. PubMed ID: 32948675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls. Peters J; D'Esposito M PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceptual decision making: drift-diffusion model is equivalent to a Bayesian model. Bitzer S; Park H; Blankenburg F; Kiebel SJ Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():102. PubMed ID: 24616689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses. Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The dynamics of interference control across childhood and adolescence: Distribution analyses in three conflict tasks and ten age groups. Ambrosi S; Śmigasiewicz K; Burle B; Blaye A Dev Psychol; 2020 Dec; 56(12):2262-2280. PubMed ID: 33119361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The ease and sureness of a decision: evidence accumulation of conflict and uncertainty. Mandali A; Weidacker K; Kim SG; Voon V Brain; 2019 May; 142(5):1471-1482. PubMed ID: 30726914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tracking dynamic adjustments to decision making and performance monitoring processes in conflict tasks. Feuerriegel D; Jiwa M; Turner WF; Andrejević M; Hester R; Bode S Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118265. PubMed ID: 34146710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Bayesian Reformulation of the Extended Drift-Diffusion Model in Perceptual Decision Making. Fard PR; Park H; Warkentin A; Kiebel SJ; Bitzer S Front Comput Neurosci; 2017; 11():29. PubMed ID: 28553219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks. Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]