These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39106900)
21. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Yimarj P; Subbalekha K; Dhanesuan K; Siriwatana K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):672-678. PubMed ID: 32939934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study. Zhang S; Cai Q; Chen W; Lin Y; Gao Y; Wu D; Chen J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):220-229. PubMed ID: 38033198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers. Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Fan S; Gielisch MW; Díaz L; Thiem DGE; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37083908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: A randomized clinical trial. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 May; 34(5):438-449. PubMed ID: 36794798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy and patient-centered results of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws: a retrospective cohort study. Fu S; Sun W; Zhu J; Huang B; Ji W; Shi B Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5427-5438. PubMed ID: 37480368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study. Chen J; Bai X; Ding Y; Shen L; Sun X; Cao R; Yang F; Wang L BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 36978064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Gargallo-Albiol J; Zilleruelo-Pozo MJ; Lucas-Taulé E; Muñoz-Peñalver J; Paternostro-Betancourt D; Hernandez-Alfaro F Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2783-2791. PubMed ID: 34782925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study. Brilli D; Cauli I; Cassetta M J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105093. PubMed ID: 38788916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series. Zhao N; Du L; Lv C; Liang J; He L; Zhou Q J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105035. PubMed ID: 38734299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Bergé SJ; Xi T; Maal TJJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27887876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]