These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3910821)

  • 1. Influencing prolificacy of sows by selection for physiological factors.
    Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Lamberson WR; Sasaki S
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1985; 33():139-49. PubMed ID: 3910821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 17235020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Canario L; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3209-17. PubMed ID: 17609463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy.
    Legault C
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1985; 33():151-66. PubMed ID: 3910822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic basis of prolificacy in Meishan pigs.
    Haley CS; Lee GJ
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():247-59. PubMed ID: 8145208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
    Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate.
    Su G; Lund MS; Sorensen D
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17339413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection for ovulation rate in rabbits: genetic parameters, direct response, and correlated response on litter size.
    Laborda P; Mocé ML; Santacreu MA; Blasco A
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):2981-7. PubMed ID: 21622874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms of regulation of litter size in pigs on the genome level.
    Distl O
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():10-6. PubMed ID: 17688597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity.
    Freking BA; Leymaster KA; Vallet JL; Christenson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2093-103. PubMed ID: 17504953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of genetic selection for prolificacy in pigs.
    Bichard M; David PJ
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1985; 33():127-38. PubMed ID: 3910820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine.
    Ruíz-Flores A; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2286-97. PubMed ID: 11583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Components of litter size in mice after 110 generations of selection.
    Holt M; Vangen O; Farstad W
    Reproduction; 2004 May; 127(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 15129014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptus development during blastocyst elongation in lines of pigs selected for increased uterine capacity or ovulation rate.
    Miles JR; Freking BA; Blomberg LA; Vallet JL; Zuelke KA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2126-34. PubMed ID: 18469062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of confinement, climatic conditions and litter parity on the seasonal variations of the fertility rate and prolificacy.
    Martinat-Botte F; Dagorn J; Terqui M; Dando P
    Ann Rech Vet; 1984; 15(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 6486687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine.
    Lamberson WR; Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Long TE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3129-43. PubMed ID: 1894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.
    Johnson RK; Nielsen MK; Casey DS
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):541-57. PubMed ID: 10229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.