These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39109088)

  • 1. Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders.
    Chan KM
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):828-842. PubMed ID: 39109088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Where Are the Sore Losers? Competitive Authoritarianism, Incumbent Defeat, and Electoral Trust in Zambia's 2021 Election.
    Kerr N; Krönke M; Wahman M
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):608-631. PubMed ID: 39109091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Dynamics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democracies: Election Timing, Blatant Fraud, and the Legitimacy of Governance.
    Higashijima M; Kadoya H; Yanai Y
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):472-494. PubMed ID: 39109089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distrusting the Process: Electoral Trust, Operational Ideology, and Nonvoting Political Participation in the 2020 American Electorate.
    Fitz EB; Saunders KL
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):843-857. PubMed ID: 39109092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
    Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.
    Fortin-Rittberger J; Harfst P; Dingler SC
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2017 Jul; 27(3):350-368. PubMed ID: 28824703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Electoral Misinformation Nexus: How News Consumption, Platform Use, and Trust in News Influence Belief in Electoral Misinformation.
    Mont'Alverne C; Arguedas AR; Banerjee S; Toff B; Fletcher R; Nielsen RK
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):681-707. PubMed ID: 39109090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
    Gerstlé J; Nai A
    Eur J Commun; 2019 Aug; 34(4):410-444. PubMed ID: 31534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The (un)making of electoral transparency through technology: The 2017 Kenyan presidential election controversy.
    Passanti C; Pommerolle ME
    Soc Stud Sci; 2022 Dec; 52(6):928-953. PubMed ID: 36154350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-election survey data: Local democracy and the 2018 local elections in the Czech Republic.
    Šaradín P; Lebeda T; Lysek J; Soukop M; Ostrá D; Lebedová E
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107039. PubMed ID: 34013001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The principal components of electoral regimes: separating autocracies from pseudo-democracies.
    Wiesner K; Bien S; Wilson MC
    R Soc Open Sci; 2024 Oct; 11(10):240262. PubMed ID: 39386986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Institutionalising electoral uncertainty and authoritarian regime survival.
    Bernhard M; B Edgell A; Lindberg SI
    Eur J Polit Res; 2020 May; 59(2):465-487. PubMed ID: 32421052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Walking the Talk: How to Identify Anti-Pluralist Parties.
    Medzihorsky J; Lindberg SI
    Party Politics; 2024 May; 30(3):420-434. PubMed ID: 38711799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.
    Jiménez R; Hidalgo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100884. PubMed ID: 24971462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meddling in the 2016 Elections and Satisfaction With Democracy in the US.
    Justwan F; Baumgaertner B; Curtright M
    Polit Stud (Oxf); 2024 May; 72(2):505-526. PubMed ID: 38716045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peace engineering: The contribution of blockchain systems to the e-voting process.
    Baudier P; Kondrateva G; Ammi C; Seulliet E
    Technol Forecast Soc Change; 2021 Jan; 162():120397. PubMed ID: 33071364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introducing the Democratic Electoral Systems data, 1919-1945.
    Bormann NC; Kaftan L
    Open Res Eur; 2024; 4():73. PubMed ID: 39148582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.