These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39111643)

  • 1. The influence of task-irrelevant color perception on flanker task performance: Insights from behavioral and ERP data.
    Chen Y; Cheng W; Deng X; Yang Y; Li Z; Zhong J; Li W; Cheng B
    Physiol Behav; 2024 Oct; 285():114654. PubMed ID: 39111643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The human brain deals with violating general color or depth knowledge in different time courses.
    Tang X; Yu S; Takahashi S; Yang J; Ejima Y; Gao Y; Wu Q; Wu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Aug; 201():108941. PubMed ID: 38908477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flanker paradigm contains conflict and distraction factors with distinct neural mechanisms: an ERP analysis in a 2-1 mapping task.
    Zhou S; Xiong S; Cheng W; Wang Y
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2019 Aug; 13(4):341-356. PubMed ID: 31354880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parsing the Neural Mechanisms of Short-Term and Long-Term Associations in the Flanker Tasks: An ERP Analysis.
    Cheng W; Huang Q; Chen Y; Dai W; Cui L; Shan S; Chen Z; Zhou S
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2021; 15():626907. PubMed ID: 34421550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.
    Donohue SE; Todisco AE; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 25(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 23249355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.
    McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-specific relationships between error-related ERPs and behavior: Flanker, Stroop, and Go/Nogo tasks.
    Park B; Holbrook A; Lutz MC; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ; Clayson PE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Oct; 204():112409. PubMed ID: 39121995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.
    Tillman CM; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():165-73. PubMed ID: 20573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive conflict increases processing of negative, task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Ligeza TS; Wyczesany M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():126-135. PubMed ID: 28757233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict processing is modulated by positive emotion: ERP data from a flanker task.
    Kanske P; Kotz SA
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 219(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 21295076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test.
    Ergen M; Saban S; Kirmizi-Alsan E; Uslu A; Keskin-Ergen Y; Demiralp T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 25135670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.
    Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; McKay CC; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():14-28. PubMed ID: 26827917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.
    Derosiere G; Klein PA; Nozaradan S; Zénon A; Mouraux A; Duque J
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9486-9504. PubMed ID: 30201772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.