These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3911165)

  • 1. Bouncy knee: a stance phase flex-extend knee unit.
    Fisher LD; Judge GW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Dec; 9(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 3911165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bouncy knee in a semi-automatic knee lock prosthesis.
    Fisher LD; Lord M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3523432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of an above-knee prosthesis equipped with a microcomputer-controlled knee joint: first test results.
    Aeyels B; Peeraer L; Vander Sloten J; Van der Perre G
    J Biomed Eng; 1992 May; 14(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 1588776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary kinematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
    Yakimovich T; Lemaire ED; Kofman J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 16949186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An above-knee prosthesis with a system of energy recovery: a technical note.
    Farber BS; Jacobson JS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 Nov; 32(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 8770798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of stance control orthoses on gait characteristics and energy expenditure in knee-ankle-foot orthosis users.
    Davis PC; Bach TM; Pereira DM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 20470059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of prosthetic ankle mobility in the sagittal plane on the gait of transfemoral amputees wearing a stance phase controlled knee prosthesis.
    Lee S; Hong J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Feb; 223(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19278201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
    Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
    Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 18242995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
    Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of prosthetic mass distribution on the spatiotemporal characteristics and knee kinematics of transfemoral amputee locomotion.
    Hekmatfard M; Farahmand F; Ebrahimi I
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 22832472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new modular six-bar linkage trans-femoral prosthesis for walking and squatting.
    Chakraborty JK; Patil KM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 7991367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ankle-knee synchronous in a new endoskeletal above-knee prosthetic mechanism: a preliminary report.
    Li WK
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1976 Oct; 57(10):479-81. PubMed ID: 973790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of direct measurement versus cadaver estimates of anthropometry in the calculation of joint moments during above-knee prosthetic gait in pediatrics.
    Goldberg EJ; Requejo PS; Fowler EG
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):695-700. PubMed ID: 18031751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newly designed computer controlled knee-ankle-foot orthosis (Intelligent Orthosis).
    Suga T; Kameyama O; Ogawa R; Matsuura M; Oka H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 9881611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HRC adjustable pneumatic swing-phase control knee.
    Nakamura S; Sawamura S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1978 Dec; 2(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 733460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and functional evaluation of a quasi-passive compliant stance control knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
    Shamaei K; Napolitano PC; Dollar AM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Mar; 22(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 24608684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and quantitative evaluation of a stance-phase controlled prosthetic knee joint for children.
    Andrysek J; Naumann S; Cleghorn WL
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 16425824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the gait performance of non-fluid-based swing-phase control mechanisms in transfemoral prostheses.
    Furse A; Cleghorn W; Andrysek J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Aug; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 21592917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical characterization and comparison of energy storage and return prostheses.
    Rigney SM; Simmons A; Kark L
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Mar; 41():90-96. PubMed ID: 28111069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.