These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39114967)

  • 1. Revisiting Dominance in Population Genetics.
    Di C; Lohmueller KE
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Aug; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 39114967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constraining models of dominance for nonsynonymous mutations in the human genome.
    Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
    PLoS Genet; 2024 Sep; 20(9):e1011198. PubMed ID: 39302992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene expression drives the evolution of dominance.
    Huber CD; Durvasula A; Hancock AM; Lohmueller KE
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jul; 9(1):2750. PubMed ID: 30013096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deleterious Variation in Natural Populations and Implications for Conservation Genetics.
    Robinson J; Kyriazis CC; Yuan SC; Lohmueller KE
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2023 Feb; 11():93-114. PubMed ID: 36332644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.
    Fernández B; García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2005 Dec; 171(4):2097-112. PubMed ID: 16118193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The population genetics of beneficial mutations.
    Orr HA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Apr; 365(1544):1195-201. PubMed ID: 20308094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation.
    Manna F; Martin G; Lenormand T
    Genetics; 2011 Nov; 189(3):923-37. PubMed ID: 21890744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Peters AD; Halligan DL; Whitlock MC; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2003 Oct; 165(2):589-99. PubMed ID: 14573472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.
    Fernández B; García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2004 Oct; 168(2):1053-69. PubMed ID: 15514075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constraining models of dominance for nonsynonymous mutations in the human genome.
    Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38463985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Computational Simulations to Model Deleterious Variation and Genetic Load in Natural Populations.
    Kyriazis CC; Robinson JA; Lohmueller KE
    Am Nat; 2023 Dec; 202(6):737-752. PubMed ID: 38033186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inbreeding load, average dominance and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus.
    Willis JH
    Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1885-98. PubMed ID: 10581293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of overdominance on characterizing deleterious mutations in large natural populations.
    Li JL; Li J; Deng HW
    Genetics; 1999 Feb; 151(2):895-913. PubMed ID: 9927478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance.
    Phadnis N; Fry JD
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):385-92. PubMed ID: 15972465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.
    Zhang XS; Wang J; Hill WG
    Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):597-610. PubMed ID: 15020447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dominance of Deleterious Alleles Controls the Response to a Population Bottleneck.
    Balick DJ; Do R; Cassa CA; Reich D; Sunyaev SR
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1005436. PubMed ID: 26317225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deleterious variation shapes the genomic landscape of introgression.
    Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Oct; 14(10):e1007741. PubMed ID: 30346959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolutionary dynamics of local adaptations under genetic rescue is determined by mutational load and polygenicity.
    Zhang Y; Stern AJ; Nielsen R
    J Hered; 2024 Jul; 115(4):373-384. PubMed ID: 38146994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.
    Agrawal AF; Whitlock MC
    Genetics; 2011 Feb; 187(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 21098719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Dominance on Adaptation in Changing Environments.
    Devi A; Jain K
    Genetics; 2020 Sep; 216(1):227-240. PubMed ID: 32723776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.