These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39116478)
1. Approaches for hysterectomy and implementation of robot-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological disease: A cost analysis study in a large university hospital. Delameilleure M; Timmerman S; Vandoren C; Ledger A; Vansteenkiste N; Dewilde K; Page AS; Housmans S; Van den Bosch T; Deprest J; Froyman W Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Oct; 301():105-113. PubMed ID: 39116478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center. Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Corso S; Pirovano C; Trio C; Villa M; Turoli D; Youssef A J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27460843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery. Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions. Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy. Dandolu V; Pathak P Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD003677. PubMed ID: 16625589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jan; (1):CD003677. PubMed ID: 15674911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Garry R; Fountain J; Brown J; Manca A; Mason S; Sculpher M; Napp V; Bridgman S; Gray J; Lilford R Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(26):1-154. PubMed ID: 15215018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct cost of hysterectomy: comparison of robotic versus other routes. Kaaki B; Lewis E; Takallapally S; Cleveland B J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):305-310. PubMed ID: 31165995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy? Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Lawrie TA; Liu H; Lu D; Dowswell T; Song H; Wang L; Shi G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD011422. PubMed ID: 30985921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]