These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39120780)

  • 1. Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.
    Ursin F; Müller R; Funer F; Liedtke W; Renz D; Wiertz S; Ranisch R
    Med Health Care Philos; 2024 Dec; 27(4):513-528. PubMed ID: 39120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An update on the "empirical turn" in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals.
    Wangmo T; Hauri S; Gennet E; Anane-Sarpong E; Provoost V; Elger BS
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 29415709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.
    Mertz M; Nobile H; Kahrass H
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 Jun; 27(4):960-978. PubMed ID: 32238039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues.
    Schneider M; Vayena E; Blasimme A
    J Med Ethics; 2023 Nov; 49(11):783-790. PubMed ID: 34509981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Sociotechnical Ethics of Digital Health: A Critique and Extension of Approaches From Bioethics.
    Shaw JA; Donia J
    Front Digit Health; 2021; 3():725088. PubMed ID: 34713196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.
    Mertz M; Schildmann J
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 28733796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing new ways to listen: the value of narrative approaches in empirical (bio)ethics.
    Roest B; Milota M; Leget C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Sep; 22(1):124. PubMed ID: 34530832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical population and public health ethics: A review and critical analysis to advance robust empirical-normative inquiry.
    Knight R
    Health (London); 2016 May; 20(3):274-90. PubMed ID: 25956917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current ethical and social issues in epidemiology.
    Salerno J; Coughlin SS; Goodman KW; Hlaing WM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 80():37-42. PubMed ID: 36758845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of artificial intelligence clinical applications: Detailed case analyses show value of healthcare ethics approach in identifying patient care issues.
    Rogers WA; Draper H; Carter SM
    Bioethics; 2021 Sep; 35(7):623-633. PubMed ID: 34046918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a Social Bioethics Through Interpretivism: A Framework for Healthcare Ethics.
    Dougherty RJ; Fins JJ
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2024 Jan; 33(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 37622652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.
    Jongsma KR; Bredenoord AL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; 21(1):81. PubMed ID: 32867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical research in medical ethics: an introduction.
    Arnold RM; Forrow L
    Theor Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):195-6. PubMed ID: 11643189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis.
    Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 32(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 16574880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative Values: Perspectives on a Neuroimaging Technology From Above and Within the Ethical Landscape.
    Samuel G; Cribb A; Owens J; Williams C
    J Bioeth Inq; 2016 Sep; 13(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 27334528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics.
    Hoffmaster B
    Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 29280167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.
    Racine E; Cascio MA; Montreuil M; Bogossian A
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2019 Aug; 40(4):253-278. PubMed ID: 31587142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analysis of the challenges and dilemmas that bioethics of the 21st century will face in the digital health era].
    Panadés Zafra R; Amorós Parramon N; Albiol-Perarnau M; Yuguero Torres O
    Aten Primaria; 2024 Jul; 56(7):102901. PubMed ID: 38452658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies.
    Davies R; Ives J; Dunn M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():15. PubMed ID: 25885575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical Realism and Empirical Bioethics: A Methodological Exposition.
    McKeown A
    Health Care Anal; 2017 Sep; 25(3):191-211. PubMed ID: 25716752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.