These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39121097)

  • 1. Description of a new low-cost and open-source audiometer and its validation with normal-hearing listeners: The Aupiometer.
    Isnard V; Chastres V; Andéol G
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0306751. PubMed ID: 39121097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
    Chow AHC; Cai T; McPherson B; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221405. PubMed ID: 31437206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
    Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Guo Z; Yu G; Zhou H; Wang X; Lu Y; Meng Q
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211057367. PubMed ID: 34796771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Multicenter Validity Study of Four Smartphone Hearing Test Apps in Optimized and Home Environments.
    Swords C; Twumasi E; Fitzgerald M; Fitzsimons-West E; Luo M; Dunne H; Lim KH; Jones O; Law S; Myuran T; Smith G; Tailor BV; Wakelam O; de Cates C; Borsetto D; Tysome J; Donnelly N; Axon P; Bance M; Smith ME
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2864-2870. PubMed ID: 38214403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of application-based audiometry for hearing evaluation.
    Lee SY; Seo HW; Jung SM; Lee SH; Chung JH
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7359. PubMed ID: 38548854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration and initial validation of a low-cost computer-based screening audiometer coupled to consumer insert phone-earmuff combination for boothless audiometry.
    Seluakumaran K; Shaharudin MN
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):850-858. PubMed ID: 34455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise.
    Drennan WR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 34727540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
    Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
    Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Emerging Future of Mobile Audiometry: A Prospective Validation Study of the Mimi Hearing Test Application.
    Moazzami C; Gagnon C; Bertrand L; Saliba I; Saliba J
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Aug; 45(7):740-744. PubMed ID: 38942612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the peripheral hearing system of sport divers.
    Hausmann D; Laabling S; Hoth S; Plinkert PK; Klingmann C
    Undersea Hyperb Med; 2011; 38(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 22292257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing Agreement between Frequency-Specific Chirp Auditory Steady-State Response and Pure Tone Audiometry in Adults by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
    Chen M; Wei Y; Wang X; Liu L; Liu M; Jiang G; Wei F
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2022; 84(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 33979798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.