These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39133711)

  • 1. Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research.
    Schneider JW; Allum N; Andersen JP; Petersen MB; Madsen EB; Mejlgaard N; Zachariae R
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0304342. PubMed ID: 39133711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education.
    Maggio L; Dong T; Driessen E; Artino A
    Perspect Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 8(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 30915714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
    Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes.
    Krishna A; Peter SM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203470. PubMed ID: 30161249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research.
    Ravn T; Sørensen MP
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):40. PubMed ID: 34136962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
    Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Xie Y; Wang K; Kong Y
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):41. PubMed ID: 34189653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.
    Kaiser M; Drivdal L; Hjellbrekke J; Ingierd H; Rekdal OB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Dec; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 34932191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
    Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual, institutional, and scientific environment factors associated with questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in scientific health services research publications.
    Gerrits RG; Mulyanto J; Wammes JD; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):828. PubMed ID: 32883306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey.
    Conix S; De Peuter S; Block A; Vaesen K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293310. PubMed ID: 37917785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education.
    Artino AR; Driessen EW; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2019 Jan; 94(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 30113363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
    Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison.
    Rabelo ALA; Farias JEM; Sarmet MM; Joaquim TCR; Hoersting RC; Victorino L; Modesto JGN; Pilati R
    Int J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 55(4):674-683. PubMed ID: 31745980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan - a confession.
    Fahim A; Sadaf A; Jafari FH; Siddique K; Sethi A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11. PubMed ID: 38297258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices.
    Sacco DF; Brown M; Bruton SV
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1321-1337. PubMed ID: 30259269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Questionable research practices and cumulative science: The consequences of selective reporting on effect size bias and heterogeneity.
    Anderson SF; Liu X
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36951733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handling Anomalous Data in the Lab: Students' Perspectives on Deleting and Discarding.
    Johansen MW; Christiansen FV
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):1107-1128. PubMed ID: 32166525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
    Okonta P; Rossouw T
    Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
    Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.