These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39133711)

  • 21. Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.
    Sijtsma K
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 25820980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.
    Bouter L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):2363-2369. PubMed ID: 31965429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?
    Motyl M; Demos AP; Carsel TS; Hanson BE; Melton ZJ; Mueller AB; Prims JP; Sun J; Washburn AN; Wong KM; Yantis C; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 28447837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts.
    Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Jul; 15(3):216-226. PubMed ID: 31865855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.
    Pupovac V; Prijić-Samaržija S; Petrovečki M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Feb; 23(1):165-181. PubMed ID: 26940319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns.
    Neoh MJY; Carollo A; Lee A; Esposito G
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Oct; 10(10):230677. PubMed ID: 37859842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing an active intervention to deter researchers' use of questionable research practices.
    Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF; Didlake R
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():24. PubMed ID: 31798975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists.
    Agnoli F; Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Albiero P; Cubelli R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172792. PubMed ID: 28296929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A transcultural case study of Chinese and Flemish researchers.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    Account Res; 2018; 25(6):350-369. PubMed ID: 30081659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Survey on the Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices of Medical Students, PhD Students, and Supervisors at the Zagreb School of Medicine in Croatia.
    Ljubenković AM; Borovečki A; Ćurković M; Hofmann B; Holm S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021 Oct; 16(4):435-449. PubMed ID: 34310249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
    Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
    Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research.
    Were E; Kaguiri E; Kiplagat J
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):372-389. PubMed ID: 32324050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Social influences on trajectories of self-rated health: evidence from Britain, Germany, Denmark and the USA.
    Sacker A; Worts D; McDonough P
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 19996360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey.
    Pryor ER; Habermann B; Broome ME
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 17526690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices.
    Bruton SV; Medlin M; Brown M; Sacco DF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1531-1547. PubMed ID: 31981051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
    Leaviss J; Davis S; Ren S; Hamilton J; Scope A; Booth A; Sutton A; Parry G; Buszewicz M; Moss-Morris R; White P
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Sep; 24(46):1-490. PubMed ID: 32975190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Institutional approaches to preventing questionable research practices.
    Troy JD; Rockhold F; Samsa GP
    Account Res; 2023 May; 30(4):252-259. PubMed ID: 34569387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark.
    Jensen LB; Kyvik KO; Leth-Larsen R; Eriksen MB
    Dan Med J; 2018 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 29619924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials.
    Damen JA; Heus P; Lamberink HJ; Tijdink JK; Bouter L; Glasziou P; Moher D; Otte WM; Vinkers CH; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 154():23-32. PubMed ID: 36470577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.