These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39138732)

  • 1. How do large language models answer breast cancer quiz questions? A comparative study of GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and Google Gemini.
    Irmici G; Cozzi A; Della Pepa G; De Berardinis C; D'Ascoli E; Cellina M; Cè M; Depretto C; Scaperrotta G
    Radiol Med; 2024 Oct; 129(10):1463-1467. PubMed ID: 39138732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
    Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BI-RADS Category Assignments by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Google Bard: A Multilanguage Study.
    Cozzi A; Pinker K; Hidber A; Zhang T; Bonomo L; Lo Gullo R; Christianson B; Curti M; Rizzo S; Del Grande F; Mann RM; Schiaffino S
    Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e232133. PubMed ID: 38687216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society.
    Toyama Y; Harigai A; Abe M; Nagano M; Kawabata M; Seki Y; Takase K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 37792149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard on the Japanese National Dentist Examination: A Comparison Study.
    Ohta K; Ohta S
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50369. PubMed ID: 38213361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of three artificial intelligence (AI)-based large language models in standardized testing; implications for AI-assisted dental education.
    Sabri H; Saleh MHA; Hazrati P; Merchant K; Misch J; Kumar PS; Wang HL; Barootchi S
    J Periodontal Res; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39030766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
    Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
    Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performances of GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro in "Diagnosis Please" cases.
    Sonoda Y; Kurokawa R; Nakamura Y; Kanzawa J; Kurokawa M; Ohizumi Y; Gonoi W; Abe O
    Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38954192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics.
    Holmes J; Liu Z; Zhang L; Ding Y; Sio TT; McGee LA; Ashman JB; Li X; Liu T; Shen J; Liu W
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219326. PubMed ID: 37529688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
    Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial Intelligence for Anesthesiology Board-Style Examination Questions: Role of Large Language Models.
    Khan AA; Yunus R; Sohail M; Rehman TA; Saeed S; Bu Y; Jackson CD; Sharkey A; Mahmood F; Matyal R
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 May; 38(5):1251-1259. PubMed ID: 38423884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.
    Chelli M; Descamps J; Lavoué V; Trojani C; Azar M; Deckert M; Raynier JL; Clowez G; Boileau P; Ruetsch-Chelli C
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e53164. PubMed ID: 38776130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
    Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal.
    Noda R; Izaki Y; Kitano F; Komatsu J; Ichikawa D; Shibagaki Y
    Clin Exp Nephrol; 2024 May; 28(5):465-469. PubMed ID: 38353783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiologists versus GPT-4V and Gemini Pro Vision Using Image Inputs from Diagnosis Please Cases.
    Suh PS; Shim WH; Suh CH; Heo H; Park CR; Eom HJ; Park KJ; Choe J; Kim PH; Park HJ; Ahn Y; Park HY; Choi Y; Woo CY; Park H
    Radiology; 2024 Jul; 312(1):e240273. PubMed ID: 38980179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
    He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e56655. PubMed ID: 38630520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
    Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
    He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
    ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38529075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of large language models in breast cancer clinical scenarios: a comparative analysis based on ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Claude2.
    Deng L; Wang T; Yangzhang ; Zhai Z; Tao W; Li J; Zhao Y; Luo S; Xu J
    Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):1941-1950. PubMed ID: 38668655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Triage Performance Across Large Language Models, ChatGPT, and Untrained Doctors in Emergency Medicine: Comparative Study.
    Masanneck L; Schmidt L; Seifert A; Kölsche T; Huntemann N; Jansen R; Mehsin M; Bernhard M; Meuth SG; Böhm L; Pawlitzki M
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jun; 26():e53297. PubMed ID: 38875696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.