These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39140430)

  • 1. Disturbances can facilitate prior invasions more than subsequent invasions in microbial communities.
    Lear L; Hesse E; Buckling A
    Ecol Lett; 2024 Aug; 27(8):e14493. PubMed ID: 39140430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotic resistance shapes the influence of propagule pressure on invasion success in bacterial communities.
    Jones ML; Ramoneda J; Rivett DW; Bell T
    Ecology; 2017 Jul; 98(7):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 28397255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disturbance-mediated invasions are dependent on community resource abundance.
    Lear L; Padfield D; Inamine H; Shea K; Buckling A
    Ecology; 2022 Aug; 103(8):e3728. PubMed ID: 35412647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elevated success of multispecies bacterial invasions impacts community composition during ecological succession.
    Rivett DW; Jones ML; Ramoneda J; Mombrikotb SB; Ransome E; Bell T
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Apr; 21(4):516-524. PubMed ID: 29446215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotic Interactions Are More Important than Propagule Pressure in Microbial Community Invasions.
    Albright MBN; Sevanto S; Gallegos-Graves V; Dunbar J
    mBio; 2020 Oct; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33109758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Niche and fitness differences determine invasion success and impact in laboratory bacterial communities.
    Li SP; Tan J; Yang X; Ma C; Jiang L
    ISME J; 2019 Feb; 13(2):402-412. PubMed ID: 30254322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Native and Invading Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) Microbiomes Differ in Composition and Diversity of Bacteria.
    Lu-Irving P; Harenčár JG; Sounart H; Welles SR; Swope SM; Baltrus DA; Dlugosch KM
    mSphere; 2019 Mar; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30842267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic Identity and Herbivory Drive the Invasion of a Common Aquatic Microbial Invader.
    Bolius S; Morling K; Wiedner C; Weithoff G
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():1598. PubMed ID: 32754141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of propagule pressure on whole community invasions in biomethane-producing communities.
    Sierocinski P; Soria Pascual J; Padfield D; Salter M; Buckling A
    iScience; 2021 Jun; 24(6):102659. PubMed ID: 34151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Habitat Disturbances Modulate the Barrier Effect of Resident Soil Microbiota on
    Spor A; Camargo ARO; Bru D; Gaba S; Garmyn D; Gal L; Piveteau P
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():927. PubMed ID: 32547502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncovering the rules of microbial community invasions.
    Vila JCC; Jones ML; Patel M; Bell T; Rosindell J
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2019 Aug; 3(8):1162-1171. PubMed ID: 31358951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stochastic processes govern invasion success in microbial communities when the invader is phylogenetically close to resident bacteria.
    Kinnunen M; Dechesne A; Albrechtsen HJ; Smets BF
    ISME J; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2748-2756. PubMed ID: 30002504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propagule pressure increase and phylogenetic diversity decrease community's susceptibility to invasion.
    Ketola T; Saarinen K; Lindström L
    BMC Ecol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):15. PubMed ID: 28399832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamics of an experimental microbial invasion.
    Acosta F; Zamor RM; Najar FZ; Roe BA; Hambright KD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(37):11594-9. PubMed ID: 26324928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native species dispersal reduces community invasibility by increasing species richness and biotic resistance.
    Howeth JG
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1380-1393. PubMed ID: 28772339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disentangling the mechanisms underpinning disturbance-mediated invasion.
    Lear L; Hesse E; Shea K; Buckling A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1919):20192415. PubMed ID: 31992171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diversity loss from multiple interacting disturbances is regime-dependent.
    Lear L; Inamine H; Shea K; Buckling A
    Ecol Lett; 2023 Dec; 26(12):2056-2065. PubMed ID: 37847646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of failure: unsuccessful bacterial invasions steer the soil microbial community away from the invader's niche.
    Mallon CA; Le Roux X; van Doorn GS; Dini-Andreote F; Poly F; Salles JF
    ISME J; 2018 Mar; 12(3):728-741. PubMed ID: 29374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invasional meltdown: invader-invader mutualism facilitates a secondary invasion.
    Green PT; O'Dowd DJ; Abbott KL; Jeffery M; Retallick K; Mac Nally R
    Ecology; 2011 Sep; 92(9):1758-68. PubMed ID: 21939072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing genotypic variation of an invasive plant species in response to soil disturbance and herbivory.
    Bayliss SL; terHorst CP; Lau JA
    Oecologia; 2017 Apr; 183(4):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 28132104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.