These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39142375)

  • 1. Most meta-analyses in oral health do not have conclusive and robust results.
    Tatas Z; Kyriakou E; Koutsiouroumpa O; Seehra J; Mavridis D; Pandis N
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105309. PubMed ID: 39142375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do pooled estimates from orthodontic meta-analyses change depending on the meta-analysis approach? A meta-epidemiological study.
    Tatas Z; Koutsiouroumpa O; Seehra J; Mavridis D; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):722-730. PubMed ID: 37435902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reevaluation of statistically significant meta-analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung-Knapp method and prediction intervals-A methodological study.
    Siemens W; Meerpohl JJ; Rohe MS; Buroh S; Schwarzer G; Becker G
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 May; 13(3):330-341. PubMed ID: 34932271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study.
    Mheissen S; Khan H; Normando D; Vaiid N; Flores-Mir C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0298526. PubMed ID: 38502662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review.
    Filges T; Siren A; Fridberg T; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 16(4):e1124. PubMed ID: 37016617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating major depressive disorder: An umbrella review and re-analysis of published meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Brini S; Brudasca NI; Hodkinson A; Kaluzinska K; Wach A; Storman D; Prokop-Dorner A; Jemioło P; Bala MM
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 100():102236. PubMed ID: 36587461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies.
    Röver C; Knapp G; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26573817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis prediction intervals are under reported in sport and exercise medicine.
    Borg DN; Impellizzeri FM; Borg SJ; Hutchins KP; Stewart IB; Jones T; Baguley BJ; Orssatto LBR; Bach AJE; Osborne JO; McMaster BS; Buhmann RL; Bon JJ; Barnett AG
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2024 Mar; 34(3):e14603. PubMed ID: 38501202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12 894 meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JP; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 26053175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction intervals reporting in orthodontic meta-analyses.
    Seehra J; Stonehouse-Smith D; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 34331450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
    Anglemyer A; Horvath HT; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):MR000034. PubMed ID: 24782322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction intervals should be included in meta-analyses published in dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Menne MC; Pandis N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2021 Dec; 129(6):e12827. PubMed ID: 34865260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.