These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39145759)
1. Changes in Brain Functional Connectivity Underlying the Space-Number Association. Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Lozito S; Scozia G; Pellegrino M; Presti SL; Gazzitano S; Giove F; Doricchi F J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Aug; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 39145759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines. Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC. Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural basis of social attention: common and distinct mechanisms for social and nonsocial orienting stimuli. Narganes-Pineda C; Paz-Alonso PM; Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Chica AB Cereb Cortex; 2023 Nov; 33(22):11010-11024. PubMed ID: 37782936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How time gets spatial: factors determining the stability and instability of the mental time line. Scozia G; Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lozito S; Pia L; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2321-2336. PubMed ID: 37468788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to trigger and keep stable directional Space-Number Associations (SNAs). Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():253-264. PubMed ID: 33307270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect. Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Scozia G; D'Onofrio M; Raffa G; Nigro S; Arnaud CR; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F Neuropsychologia; 2021 Apr; 154():107773. PubMed ID: 33567295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of visual parameters on neural activation during nonsymbolic number comparison and its relation to math competency. Wilkey ED; Barone JC; Mazzocco MMM; Vogel SE; Price GR Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():430-442. PubMed ID: 28801254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlling attention to gaze and arrows in childhood: an fMRI study of typical development and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Vaidya CJ; Foss-Feig J; Shook D; Kaplan L; Kenworthy L; Gaillard WD Dev Sci; 2011 Jul; 14(4):911-24. PubMed ID: 21676110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic numerical-spatial association in synaesthesia: An fMRI investigation. Arend I; Ashkenazi S; Yuen K; Ofir S; Henik A Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():259-266. PubMed ID: 28025017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deconstructing the architecture of dorsal and ventral attention systems with dynamic causal modeling. Vossel S; Weidner R; Driver J; Friston KJ; Fink GR J Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 32(31):10637-48. PubMed ID: 22855813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Semantic System Supports the Processing of Mathematical Principles. Liu J; Yuan L; Chen C; Cui J; Zhang H; Zhou X Neuroscience; 2019 Apr; 404():102-118. PubMed ID: 30710668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects. Narganes-Pineda C; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J; Marotta A Psychol Res; 2023 Feb; 87(1):242-259. PubMed ID: 35192045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Top-down suppression of incompatible motor activations during response selection under conflict. Klein PA; Petitjean C; Olivier E; Duque J Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():138-49. PubMed ID: 23939021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motivation by potential gains and losses affects control processes via different mechanisms in the attentional network. Paschke LM; Walter H; Steimke R; Ludwig VU; Gaschler R; Schubert T; Stelzel C Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():549-61. PubMed ID: 25731995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fronto-parietal engagement in response inhibition is inversely scaled with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom severity. Kolodny T; Mevorach C; Stern P; Biderman N; Ankaoua M; Tsafrir S; Shalev L Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 25():102119. PubMed ID: 31865022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social stimuli interfere with cognitive control in autism. Dichter GS; Belger A Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 17321151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions. Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]