These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3914578)
1. The lawyer's perspective on the use of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Bundy AL; James AE Law Med Health Care; 1985 Oct; 13(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 3914578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Italian Supreme Court has dismissed wrongful life claims. Montanari Vergallo G; Busardò FP; Signore F; Napoletano S; Marinelli E J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):60-61. PubMed ID: 26940486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound and the prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies: a medicolegal perspective. Horger EO; Tsai CC Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Oct; 74(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 2677865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk management and medical technology: the case of obstetrical malpractice. Bartlett EE J Healthc Risk Manag; 1993; 13(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10123141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cases in court: a malpractice lawyer's viewpoint. Lischer TK N C Med J; 1994 Jan; 55(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 8121506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. From a malpractice lawyer's case book. Diagnosis of Appendicitis. Ledakowich A Med Times; 1973 Mar; 101(3):155 passim. PubMed ID: 4687937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Gynecologist, pathologist, practice partner: who is responsible for undetected pregnancy? Decision of the federal court 29 June 1999]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Feb; 125(5):129-31. PubMed ID: 10705887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability. Ackmann EA Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. From a malpractice lawyer's case book. Ledakowich A Med Times; 1974 Apr; 102(4):81 passim. PubMed ID: 4821884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing liability in obstetric care. Wagner P Minn Med; 2012 Mar; 95(3):55-7. PubMed ID: 22611823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Malpractice claims, patient communication, and critical paths: a lawyer's perspective. Nolin CE Qual Manag Health Care; 1995; 3(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 10141774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What's new in surgery. Gynecology and obstetrics. McElin TW Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Feb; 136(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 4346913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal monitoring problems during labor associated with most serious ob claims. Clin Eng Inf Serv; 1984; 8(3):70-2. PubMed ID: 10267211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Training, practice and the increasing dominance of legal aspects in ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology in Austria]. Brezinka C Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Apr; 45(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 15818050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Preventable medical treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. Conclusions of the Expert Committee for Medical Treatment Errors of the North-Rhine Medical Group]. Fitting W Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Jun; 56(6):M87-90. PubMed ID: 8766495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The malpractice crisis: an attorney's viewpoint. Pegalis SE Bull N Y Acad Med; 1991; 67(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 2049570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doctor called after crowning: $8.3 million award. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jan; 28(8):1. PubMed ID: 3344349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The doctor, negligence and causation: A lawyer's exposition to doctors, scientists and lawyers. Samuels A Med Sci Law; 2018 Jul; 58(3):194-198. PubMed ID: 29783923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]