These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39145998)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis.
    Ko TK; Tan DJY; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Aug; 8():e55535. PubMed ID: 39145998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
    Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
    Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
    JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
    Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
    Byrne J; Keogh S; Cullinane C; Razzaq Z; Redmond HP
    OTO Open; 2022; 6(4):2473974X221133308. PubMed ID: 36311181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
    Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
    Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
    Hutchings HA; Remesh A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.
    Valentine MJ; Cottone G; Kramer HD; Kayastha A; Kim J; Pettinelli NJ; Kramer RC
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45174. PubMed ID: 37842495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dyslexia Articles Unboxed: Analyzing Their Readability Level.
    Matsuura Y; Jaeah C
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):e211-e216. PubMed ID: 38896567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
    Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.