These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3914901)
1. [Gingival retraction using Gingifoam. Inflation exposes the margin]. Martignoni M; Feinman P Attual Dent; 1985 Nov; 1(30):13-7. PubMed ID: 3914901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New reversible hydrocolloid for recording the retracted gingival sulcus in fixed prosthodontics: laboratory and clinical evaluation. Engelman MA; Kessler H; McEvoy R N Y J Dent; 1980; 50(7):151-62. PubMed ID: 6997781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Impression materials and gingival retraction techniques for crowns and bridges. Purton DG N Z Dent J; 1988 Jul; 84(377):80-3. PubMed ID: 3067161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Exact dimension crowns and bridges using a gingival mask of a specially developed impression material]. Quintessenz Zahntech; 1982 Mar; 8(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 7051116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft tissue transfer models: the patient-dentist-laboratory connection. Saba S J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 64(8):584-5. PubMed ID: 9785689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The intracrevicular restorative margin, the biologic width, and the maintenance of the gingival margin. Nevins M; Skurow HM Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1984; 4(3):30-49. PubMed ID: 6381360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The gingivo-dental crevice and the partial denture. Part 2: cervical margins of the preparations and their impression]. Sahel H; Nahmani L; Chouraqui M Cah Odontostomatol Touraine; 1974; 6(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 4620413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [A new method of imprint receiving for non-removable dentures]. Riakhovskiĭ AN; Muradov MA Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16482029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Technics of gingival retraction: a comparative study]. Pezzoli M; Borio PS Riv Ital Stomatol; 1982; 51(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 6764555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Studies on the impression of crown preparations by means of the double impression method with special reference to the widening of the gingival pocket]. Weiskopf J; Frentzen H; Schönherr U Dtsch Stomatol; 1967 Jan; 17(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 5336041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Problems in the precision fit of the margin edges of cast crowns]. Meiners H Dent Labor (Munch); 1986 Dec; 34(12):1939-44. PubMed ID: 3556240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]