These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39149939)

  • 1. Navigating the disappointment of manuscript rejection: An author's dialogue with a reviewer and editor of tropical doctor (TD).
    Bhattacharya K; Sharma D; Cotton M
    Trop Doct; 2024 Aug; ():494755241271955. PubMed ID: 39149939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of ManuScript Rejection sYndrome (MiSeRY): a cohort study.
    Han HC; Koshy AN; Lin T; Yudi M; Clark D; Teh AW; Farouque O
    Med J Aust; 2019 Dec; 211(11):511-513. PubMed ID: 31813172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
    Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts.
    Hausmann L; Schweitzer B; Middleton FA; Schulz JB
    J Neurochem; 2018 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 29377133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journal response types and times: the outcomes of manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor, South Africa.
    Joubert G; Mulder T; Steinberg WJ; Botes J
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():212. PubMed ID: 32963678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Every Author and Reviewer Should Know about the Publication Process in the Journal of Nematology.
    Dickson DW; Chitwood DJ; Bernard EC
    J Nematol; 1997 Dec; 29(4S):619-24. PubMed ID: 19274261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery.
    Wijnhoven BP; Dejong CH
    Br J Surg; 2010 Mar; 97(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 20099256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The peer review process.
    Tumin D; Tobias JD
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2019 Apr; 13(Suppl 1):S52-S58. PubMed ID: 30930722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
    Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
    Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
    Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are highly ranked dental journals at risk of editorial bias? An examination of information on the reporting of peer-review practices.
    Faggion CM
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(7):459-470. PubMed ID: 35016571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal.
    Isenberg SJ; Sanchez E; Zafran KC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):881-4. PubMed ID: 19211602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasons for unsuccessful research submissions to JAAPA.
    Reed H; Dehn RW; Bushardt RL
    JAAPA; 2022 May; 35(5):54-56. PubMed ID: 35421874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal.
    Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.
    Oldham MA; Kontos N; Baller E; Cerimele JM
    J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry; 2023; 64(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 36796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.