These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39150065)

  • 21. In vivo pulsed-field ablation in healthy vs. chronically infarcted ventricular myocardium: biophysical and histologic characterization.
    Sandhu U; Alkukhun L; Kheiri B; Hodovan J; Chiang K; Splanger T; Castellvi Q; Zhao Y; Nazer B
    Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1503-1509. PubMed ID: 36793229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determinants of acute irreversible electroporation lesion characteristics after pulsed field ablation: the role of voltage, contact, and adipose interference.
    Gasperetti A; Assis F; Tripathi H; Suzuki M; Gonuguntla A; Shah R; Sampognaro J; Schiavone M; Karmarkar P; Tandri H
    Europace; 2023 Aug; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 37649337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vivo porcine characterization of atrial lesion safety and efficacy utilizing a circular pulsed-field ablation catheter including assessment of collateral damage to adjacent tissue in supratherapeutic ablation applications.
    Hsu JC; Gibson D; Banker R; Doshi SK; Gidney B; Gomez T; Berman D; Datta K; Govari A; Natale A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 35510408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eliminating the effects of motion during radiofrequency lesion delivery using a novel contact-force controller.
    Gelman D; Skanes AC; Jones DL; Timofeyev M; Bar-On T; Drangova M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1652-1662. PubMed ID: 31353683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pulsed-field ablation: Computational modeling of electric fields for lesion depth analysis.
    Meckes D; Emami M; Fong I; Lau DH; Sanders P
    Heart Rhythm O2; 2022 Aug; 3(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 36097449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safety and efficacy of delivering high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions utilizing a novel temperature sensing technology.
    Rozen G; Ptaszek LM; Zilberman I; Douglas V; Heist EK; Beeckler C; Altmann A; Ruskin JN; Govari A; Mansour M
    Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f444-f450. PubMed ID: 29579196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maximal electrogram attenuation recorded from mini electrodes embedded on 4.5-mm irrigated and 8-mm nonirrigated catheters signifies lesion maturation.
    Avitall B; Horbal P; Vance D; Koblish J; Kalinski A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):192-202. PubMed ID: 25330716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Preclinical safety and effectiveness of a novel hexaspline ablation catheter.
    Yu F; Dong X; Ding L; Reddy V; Tang M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Nov; 34(11):2195-2202. PubMed ID: 37712346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dual energy for pulmonary vein isolation using dual-energy focal ablation technology integrated with a three-dimensional mapping system: SmartfIRE 3-month results.
    Duytschaever M; Račkauskas G; De Potter T; Hansen J; Knecht S; Phlips T; Vijgen J; Scherr D; Szeplaki G; Van Herendael H; Kronborg MB; Berte B; Pürerfellner H; Lukac P
    Europace; 2024 May; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 38696675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bipolar ablation with contact force-sensing of swine ventricles shows improved acute lesion features compared to sequential unipolar ablation.
    Soucek F; Caluori G; Lehar F; Jez J; Pesl M; Wolf J; Wojtaszczyk A; Belaskova S; Starek Z
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1128-1136. PubMed ID: 32083360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictors of Success for Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed-field Ablation Using a Variable-loop Catheter With 3D Mapping Integration: Complete 12-month Outcomes From inspIRE.
    De Potter T; Grimaldi M; Duytschaever M; Anic A; Vijgen J; Neuzil P; Van Herendael H; Verma A; Skanes A; Scherr D; Pürerfellner H; Rackauskas G; Jais P; Reddy VY;
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 May; 17(5):e012667. PubMed ID: 38655693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Novel Measure of Local Impedance Predicts Catheter-Tissue Contact and Lesion Formation.
    Sulkin MS; Laughner JI; Hilbert S; Kapa S; Kosiuk J; Younan P; Romero I; Shuros A; Hamann JJ; Hindricks G; Bollmann A
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e005831. PubMed ID: 29618475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Endocardial ventricular pulsed field ablation: a proof-of-concept preclinical evaluation.
    Koruth JS; Kuroki K; Iwasawa J; Viswanathan R; Brose R; Buck ED; Donskoy E; Dukkipati SR; Reddy VY
    Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):434-439. PubMed ID: 31876913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vivo assessment of catheter-tissue contact using tissue proximity indication and its impact on cardiac lesion formation in pulsed field ablation.
    Okumura Y; Watanabe R; Nagashima K; Wakamatsu Y; Byun E; Chen Q; Gomez T
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39366436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bipolar catheter ablation in ventricular myocardium.
    Liu X; Chen Q; Fan B; Zhu W; Zhao H; Zhu Y; Zhao P; Zhang F; Kojodjojo P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 43(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 31721241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterization of the impact of catheter-tissue contact force in lesion formation during cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation in an experimental swine model.
    Matía Francés R; Hernández Madrid A; Delgado A; Carrizo L; Pindado C; Moro Serrano C; Zamorano Gómez JL
    Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1679-83. PubMed ID: 24225068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of ablation catheter technology: Comparison between thigh preparation model and an in vivo beating heart.
    Leshem E; Tschabrunn CM; Contreras-Valdes FM; Zilberman I; Anter E
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 28455271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiology, Pathology, and Imaging of Pulsed Field Ablation of Scarred and Healthy Ventricles in Swine.
    Kawamura I; Reddy VY; Santos-Gallego CG; Wang BJ; Chaudhry HW; Buck ED; Mavroudis G; Jerrell S; Schneider CW; Speltz M; Dukkipati SR; Koruth JS
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2023 Jan; 16(1):e011369. PubMed ID: 36595634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of a circular-shaped pulsed field ablation catheter with magnetic sensors for pulmonary vein isolation: a multi-centre clinical study report.
    Wang Y; Lai HL; Chen Q; Liu H; Liu QM; Huang WB; Tao Y; Xiong Q; Zhou N; Zhao C; Qiu J; Xu Z; Wang DW
    Europace; 2024 Mar; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 38584395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of ventricular radiofrequency lesions in sheep using standard irrigated tip catheter versus catheter ablation enabling direct visualization.
    Sacher F; Derval N; Jadidi A; Scherr D; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Dos Santos P; Jais P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):869-73. PubMed ID: 22554117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.