These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39153939)

  • 21. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based program for locating the maxillomandibular relationship of scans acquired by using intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38458860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M; Barmak AB; Lanis A; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38443245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies.
    Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans.
    de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of the ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using two intraoral scanners.
    Ochoa-López G; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38653690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of finish line location and saliva contamination on the accuracy of crown finish line scanning.
    An H; Mickesh GJ; Cho D; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 36719010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does partial adhesive preparation design and finish line depth influence trueness and precision of intraoral scanners?
    Baldi A; Comba A; Rozzi D; Rocha Pereira GK; Valandro LF; Michelotto Tempesta R; Scotti N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):637.e1-637.e9. PubMed ID: 36907802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trueness of the apical and middle root portion segments of 3D-printed removable die and alveolar cast designs manufactured using stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Azpiazu-Flores FX; Johnston WM; Morton D; Lin WS; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39023016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trueness and Precision of Eight Intraoral Scanners with Different Finishing Line Designs: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Falih MY; Majeed MA
    Eur J Dent; 2023 Oct; 17(4):1056-1064. PubMed ID: 36513335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Elter B; Tak Ö
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla.
    Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.
    Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
    Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gurpinar B; Tak O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different preparation designs of minimally invasive occlusal onlays on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Ashraf K; Ebeid K; Salah T
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38053453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.