These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3915865)

  • 1. Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.
    Lubowski D; Hunt D
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1985 Aug; 55(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 3915865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The absorbable dermal staple device: a faster, more cost-effective method for incisional closure.
    Cross KJ; Teo EH; Wong SL; Lambe JS; Rohde CH; Grant RT; Ascherman JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 19568054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods].
    Priesack W; Troidl H; Kusche J
    Chirurg; 1985 Mar; 56(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 3886325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.
    Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S
    BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
    Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure.
    Nilsson T; Frimodt-Møller C; Jeppesen N
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1985; 74(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 3893308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Staples versus sutures in the closure of scalp wounds: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial.
    Ritchie AJ; Rocke LG
    Injury; 1989 Jul; 20(4):217-8. PubMed ID: 2592097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?
    Daniilidis K; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ettinger S; Claassen L; Plaass C; Lerch M; Waizy H; Martinelli N; Yao D
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 31055725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of skin staples and conventional sutures in closure of extraoral surgical wounds in neck region: A double-blind clinical study.
    Pandey ND; Singh AK; Choudhary AK; Jina G; Thakare A; Supe NB
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 36683917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures.
    Ranaboldo CJ; Rowe-Jones DC
    Br J Surg; 1992 Nov; 79(11):1172-3. PubMed ID: 1467895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
    Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.
    Eldrup J; Wied U; Andersen B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):501-2. PubMed ID: 7048825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.
    Meiring L; Cilliers K; Barry R; Nel CJ
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Sep; 62(11):371-2. PubMed ID: 7112304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.
    Ku D; Koo DH; Bae DS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():413-421. PubMed ID: 32791393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations.
    Angelini GD; Butchart EG; Armistead SH; Breckenridge IM
    Thorax; 1984 Dec; 39(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 6096982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.
    Gatt D; Quick CR; Owen-Smith MS
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):318-20. PubMed ID: 3901864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized, controlled study comparing the cosmetic outcome of a new wound closure device with Prolene suture closing caesarean wounds.
    Juergens S; Maune C; Kezze F; Mohr T; Scheuer K; Mallmann P
    Int Wound J; 2011 Aug; 8(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 21615866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Study of Use of Reusable Skin Staples and Vertical Mattress Sutures in the Closure of Midline Laparotomy Wounds.
    Anyanwu SNC; Okoye AO; Obiesie EA; Eze BU; Ihekwoaba EC; Nwofor AME
    J West Afr Coll Surg; 2024; 14(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 38486653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds.
    Pineros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Rodeheaver G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 23428250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.