These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39159089)

  • 21. Cavity-based architecture to preserve quantum coherence and entanglement.
    Man ZX; Xia YJ; Lo Franco R
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13843. PubMed ID: 26351004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Demonstration of controlled-NOT quantum gates on a pair of superconducting quantum bits.
    Plantenberg JH; de Groot PC; Harmans CJ; Mooij JE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7146):836-9. PubMed ID: 17568742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Charge-Insensitive Single-Atom Spin-Orbit Qubit in Silicon.
    Salfi J; Mol JA; Culcer D; Rogge S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Jun; 116(24):246801. PubMed ID: 27367400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Geometry and Entanglement of Two-Qubit States in the Quantum Probabilistic Representation.
    López-Saldívar JA; Castaños O; Nahmad-Achar E; López-Peña R; Man'ko MA; Man'ko VI
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Aug; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 33265719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manipulating Complex Hybrid Entanglement and Testing Multipartite Bell Inequalities in a Superconducting Circuit.
    Ma Y; Pan X; Cai W; Mu X; Xu Y; Hu L; Wang W; Wang H; Song YP; Yang ZB; Zheng SB; Sun L
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Oct; 125(18):180503. PubMed ID: 33196232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generation of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits.
    Neeley M; Bialczak RC; Lenander M; Lucero E; Mariantoni M; O'Connell AD; Sank D; Wang H; Weides M; Wenner J; Yin Y; Yamamoto T; Cleland AN; Martinis JM
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):570-3. PubMed ID: 20882012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bound entangled Gaussian states.
    Werner RF; Wolf MM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2001 Apr; 86(16):3658-61. PubMed ID: 11328047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Generation of genuine entanglement up to 51 superconducting qubits.
    Cao S; Wu B; Chen F; Gong M; Wu Y; Ye Y; Zha C; Qian H; Ying C; Guo S; Zhu Q; Huang HL; Zhao Y; Li S; Wang S; Yu J; Fan D; Wu D; Su H; Deng H; Rong H; Li Y; Zhang K; Chung TH; Liang F; Lin J; Xu Y; Sun L; Guo C; Li N; Huo YH; Peng CZ; Lu CY; Yuan X; Zhu X; Pan JW
    Nature; 2023 Jul; 619(7971):738-742. PubMed ID: 37438533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Entanglement in a 20-Qubit Superconducting Quantum Computer.
    Mooney GJ; Hill CD; Hollenberg LCL
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13465. PubMed ID: 31530848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Negativity vs. purity and entropy in witnessing entanglement.
    Schneeloch J; Tison CC; Jacinto HS; Alsing PM
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4601. PubMed ID: 36944676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Entanglement of two spatially separated qubits via correlated photons.
    Sete EA; Das S
    Opt Lett; 2012 May; 37(10):1733-5. PubMed ID: 22627553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating Non-Gaussianity of a Quantum State by Measuring Orthogonal Quadratures.
    Park J
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 35205583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Observation of entanglement transition of pseudo-random mixed states.
    Liu T; Liu S; Li H; Li H; Huang K; Xiang Z; Song X; Xu K; Zheng D; Fan H
    Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):1971. PubMed ID: 37031244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Entanglement cost under positive-partial-transpose-preserving operations.
    Audenaert K; Plenio MB; Eisert J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jan; 90(2):027901. PubMed ID: 12570580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantum information in cavity quantum electrodynamics: logical gates, entanglement engineering and 'Schrödinger-cat states'.
    Haroche S
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2003 Jul; 361(1808):1339-47. PubMed ID: 12869311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating entanglement monotones with a generalization of the Wootters formula.
    Chen ZH; Ma ZH; Gühne O; Severini S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Nov; 109(20):200503. PubMed ID: 23215468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Construction of an optimal witness for unknown two-qubit entanglement.
    Park HS; Lee SS; Kim H; Choi SK; Sim HS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Dec; 105(23):230404. PubMed ID: 21231433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phase Locking between Two All-Optical Quantum Memories.
    Okamoto F; Endo M; Matsuyama M; Ishizuka Y; Liu Y; Sakakibara R; Hashimoto Y; Yoshikawa JI; van Loock P; Furusawa A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Dec; 125(26):260508. PubMed ID: 33449716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of entanglement measures and LOCC maximized quantum Fisher information of general two qubit systems.
    Erol V; Ozaydin F; Altintas AA
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jun; 4():5422. PubMed ID: 24957694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Universal quantum gate with hybrid qubits in circuit quantum electrodynamics.
    Yang CP; Zheng ZF; Zhang Y
    Opt Lett; 2018 Dec; 43(23):5765-5768. PubMed ID: 30499988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.