These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3916138)

  • 1. Guinea pig allergy tests: an overview.
    Andersen KE; Maibach HI
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Nov; 1(3):43-66. PubMed ID: 3916138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. II. Statistical analysis of data.
    Atkinson JC; Rodi SB
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 1032126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guinea pig sensitization assays. An overview.
    Andersen KE; Maibach HI
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1985; 14():263-90. PubMed ID: 3905270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Maximization test in the study of contact allergy in guinea pigs caused by acrylic fiber softener].
    Tanaka K; Mitsui T; Nishiumi S
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1975 Apr; 30(1):234. PubMed ID: 1169561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guinea pig maximization test, open epicutaneous test and chamber test in induction of delayed contact hypersensitivity.
    Kero M; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Aug; 6(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7418390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of vehicle on elicitation of DNCB contact allergy in the guinea pig.
    Christensen OB; Christensen MB; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Mar; 10(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 6713851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimization test in the guinea pig in relation to other predictive sensitization methods.
    Maurer T; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Toxicology; 1980; 15(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 7466830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How sensitizing is chlorocresol? Allergy tests in guinea pigs versus the clinical experience.
    Andersen KE; Hamann K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Jul; 11(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 6744837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Lysosomal enzyme activity as an indicator for the toxicological evaluation of contact allergens. I. Contact allergy].
    Kiss E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1983; 34(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 6612191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B; Niklasson B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):268-78. PubMed ID: 6525820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact sensitivity and bioavailability of chlorocresol.
    Andersen KE; Carlsen L; Egsgaard H; Larsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 4085224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results and 10 years' experience using an animal experiment assessment test and recommendations for its modification. 2. Recommendations for modification].
    Ziegler V; Ritter V; Stiller A
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1987; 173(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2952534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Results and 10 years' experience using an animal experiment assessment test and recommendations for its modification. 1. Results and experiences].
    Ziegler V; Süss E
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1987; 173(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 2952533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems attending patch testing for nickel sensitivity.
    Fisher AA
    Cutis; 1982 Feb; 29(2):148-52, 157, 186. PubMed ID: 7060404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guinea pig allergy test adapted to cosmetic ingredients.
    Dossou KG; Sicard C; Kalopissis G; Reymond D; Schaefer H
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1985; 14():248-62. PubMed ID: 4064748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The optimization test in the guinea-pig. A method for the predictive evaluation of the contact allergenicity of chemicals.
    Maurer T; Thomann P; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Agents Actions; 1975 May; 5(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 1155304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 1032125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intradermal test in contact allergy to metals.
    Meneghini C; Angelini G
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1979; 59(85):123-4. PubMed ID: 294087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studies on contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig.
    Tsuchiya S; Kondo M; Okamoto K; Takase Y
    Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jul; 8(4):246-55. PubMed ID: 7105687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.