These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39167145)
1. A study of the impact of the environmental protection tax on corporate employment: Evidence based on listed companies in polluting industries. Zhao J; Han M; Zhang Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Aug; 31(40):53008-53025. PubMed ID: 39167145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental protection tax and green innovation. Wang Y; Xu S; Meng X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):56670-56686. PubMed ID: 36920619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of green taxes on green innovation of enterprises: a quasi-natural experiment based on the levy of environmental protection taxes. Lu N; Zhou W Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(40):92568-92580. PubMed ID: 37491497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental protection tax and green innovation of heavily polluting enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment based on the implementation of China's environmental protection tax law. Deng J; Yang J; Liu Z; Tan Q PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286253. PubMed ID: 37319257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of environmental tax reform on corporate profit margins-based on the empirical research of the enterprises in the heavy pollution industries. He X; Jing Q Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):36337-36349. PubMed ID: 36547844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can environmental protection tax alleviate the mismatch of financing and investment maturities of heavily polluting enterprises? Li H; Xu T; Yu D; Ke Z Mar Pollut Bull; 2024 Oct; 207():116896. PubMed ID: 39226819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Has environmental protection tax reform promoted green transformation of enterprises? Evidence from China. Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Q Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(20):29472-29496. PubMed ID: 38578592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does environmental protection tax improve green total factor productivity? Experimental evidence from China. Yao C; Xi B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(48):105353-105373. PubMed ID: 37710060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental protection tax and the labor income share of companies: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Xiao Q; Jiang Y; Li R; Xiao S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):41820-41833. PubMed ID: 36640237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whether Green Finance Improves Green Innovation of Listed Companies-Evidence from China. Dong Z; Xu H; Zhang Z; Lyu Y; Lu Y; Duan H Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the greening of the tax system promote the green transformation of China's heavily polluting enterprises? Su Y; Zhu X; Deng Y; Chen M; Piao Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):54927-54944. PubMed ID: 36879089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the impact of green tax reforms on corporate environmental performance and economic growth: do green reforms promote the environmental performance in heavily polluted enterprises? Shi X; Jiang Z; Bai D; Fahad S; Irfan M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):56054-56072. PubMed ID: 36913016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the environmental protection tax reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Yin Q; Lin Y; Yuan B; Dong Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(48):106198-106213. PubMed ID: 37723399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance of Health Risk and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence From China. Wu W; Zhang P; Zhu D; Jiang X; Jakovljevic M Front Public Health; 2022; 10():897386. PubMed ID: 35832274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Green Finance Policies Foster Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance of Corporate? Wang X; Elahi E; Khalid Z Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can environmental protection tax aggravate illegal pollution discharge of heavy polluting enterprises? Lu J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(22):33796-33808. PubMed ID: 35028839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the new Environmental Protection Law on corporate financialization in China. Xie G; Yang Y; Jiang K; Chen Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(55):83596-83611. PubMed ID: 35764736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on carbon intensity in China. Zhong S; Zhou Z; Jin D Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(20):29695-29718. PubMed ID: 38589588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The environmental cost of tax administration: evidence from a regression discontinuity design in China. Huang B; Tan G; Xiao R; Li J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):11046-11064. PubMed ID: 36087180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can the China's environmental tax reform improve the enterprises sustainable environmental protection practice?-from the perspective of ISO14001 certification. Ma X; Cui Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(46):102604-102623. PubMed ID: 37668776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]