These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center. Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: experience in Switzerland. Häner JD; Räber L; Moro C; Losdat S; Windecker S Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1294930. PubMed ID: 38116535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion. Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishing a robotic-assisted PCI program: experiences at a large tertiary referral center. Brunner FJ; Waldeyer C; Zengin-Sahm E; Kondziella C; Schrage B; Clemmensen P; Westermann D; Blankenberg S; Seiffert M Heart Vessels; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1669-1678. PubMed ID: 35487996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience. Patel TM; Shah SC; Pancholy SB EClinicalMedicine; 2019 Sep; 14():53-58. PubMed ID: 31709402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes. Walters D; Reeves RR; Patel M; Naghi J; Ang L; Mahmud E Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 93(4):613-617. PubMed ID: 30456889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and technical outcomes of robotic versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Jaffar-Karballai M; Haque A; Voller C; Elleithy A; Harky A J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 80(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 35165012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort. Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Procedural and one-year outcomes of robotic-assisted versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention. Bay B; Kiwus LM; Goßling A; Koester L; Blaum C; Schrage B; Clemmensen P; Blankenberg S; Waldeyer C; Seiffert M; Brunner FJ EuroIntervention; 2024 Jan; 20(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 38165113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness With Procedural Distancing. Sooknanan NN; Memon S; George JC J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E87-E91. PubMed ID: 34928816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program. Chitturi KR; Kanake S; Nguyen T; Loc B; Baden K; Bavishi C; Kumar A; Liu Z; Chan A; Karuparthi PR; Hirai T Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():115-119. PubMed ID: 35610138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study. Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and safety of robotic PCI in China: first in man experience in Asia. Dou KF; Song CX; Mu CW; Yang WX; Zhu CG; Feng L; Chen J; Song L; Ning Y; Xu B J Geriatr Cardiol; 2019 May; 16(5):401-405. PubMed ID: 31217793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent chronic total occlusion. Gong ML; Mao Y; Liu JH Chin Med J (Engl); 2020 Dec; 134(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 33522726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]