These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3916886)

  • 1. [Dimensional changes in dies as a function of the impression technic and the time before pouring].
    Contin I; Ueti M
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1985; 23(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 3916886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple dimensionally stable locating impression for use with jacket crown dies.
    Green RM
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1967 May; 17(9):325-6. PubMed ID: 5337400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The stone core intaglio in restorative dentistry.
    Schnader YE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1981 Jul; 25(3):493-510. PubMed ID: 7021238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate dies and well-fitting crowns using three-in-one, all-plastic impression trays.
    Gottlieb M
    Dent Econ; 1996 Jan; 86(1):102-3. PubMed ID: 8612944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Dimensional variations observed in finished replicas from wash technic impressions and metallo-resin crowns].
    Simon-Grivegnee A; Grimonster J
    Cah Prothese; 1982 Jan; 10(37):49-70. PubMed ID: 6764742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pouring crown and bridge impressions: helpful hint.
    Berkowitz GS; Meeker HG
    N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(3):19. PubMed ID: 16774167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Accuracy of stone dies for crowns and bridges].
    Lehmann KM; Gobbers R; Hoederath C; Hoederath JK; Holper G
    Dent Labor (Munch); 1984 Apr; 32(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 6381138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the impression result on various conditions of processing. 3. Dimensional accuracy].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jun; 24(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 4605968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
    Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The production of Cerec restorations from a plaster cast.
    Polansky R; Arnetzl G; Smetan M; Haas M; Lorenzoni M
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jan; 2(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11351449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of nickel-chromium copings before and after internal adjustments with duplicated stone dies and disclosing agent.
    Ushiwata O; de Moraes JV; Bottino MA; da Silva EG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):634-43. PubMed ID: 10842130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Impression and pouring of models with the magnetic "Splitcast" technic for mounting study models in articulators].
    Collesano V; Pessina E; Avril C; Ragni G
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1983 Nov; 52(11):897-900. PubMed ID: 6385208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simplified procedure for preparing removable dies.
    Thornton LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):306-7. PubMed ID: 11264941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dimensional accuracy of dies obtained from multiple impressions of cavity preparation. I- Silicones].
    Sansiviero A; Miura M; Simonetti EL; de Carvalho RC
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Jose Dos Campos; 1974; 3(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 4620796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.