These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39176757)

  • 21. A step-by-step guide to the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic test accuracy evaluations.
    Liu Z; Yao Z; Li C; Liu X; Chen H; Gao C
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2299-303. PubMed ID: 23695015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses.
    Pradhan R; Hoaglin DC; Cornell M; Liu W; Wang V; Yu H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():92-100. PubMed ID: 30257185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chinese herbal medicine Ginkgo biloba L. preparations for ischemic stroke: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Meng TT; You YP; Li M; Guo JB; Song XB; Ding JY; Xie XL; Li AQ; Li SJ; Yin XJ; Wang P; Wang Z; Wang BL; He QY
    J Integr Med; 2024 Mar; 22(2):163-179. PubMed ID: 38519277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol.
    Zhang Y; Liang S; Feng Y; Wang Q; Sun F; Chen S; Yang Y; He X; Zhu H; Pan H
    Syst Rev; 2022 Jan; 11(1):11. PubMed ID: 35031074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review.
    Santos ÁOD; da Silva ES; Couto LM; Reis GVL; Belo VS
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Jun; 142():104389. PubMed ID: 37187321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol.
    Briel M; Müller KF; Meerpohl JJ; von Elm E; Lang B; Motschall E; Gloy V; Lamontagne F; Schwarzer G; Bassler D;
    Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; 2():23. PubMed ID: 23621910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automatic evidence quality prediction to support evidence-based decision making.
    Sarker A; Mollá D; Paris C
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jun; 64(2):89-103. PubMed ID: 25983133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in rheumatology: a gentle introduction for clinicians.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2029-2038. PubMed ID: 31102085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Parsing Tool for Reviewers.
    Schmidt L; Shokraneh F; Steinhausen K; Adams CE
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):151. PubMed ID: 31242929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deferred cord clamping and cord milking: Certainty and quality of the evidence in meta-analyses, and systematic reviews of randomized control trials, guidelines, and implementation studies.
    McDonald SD
    Semin Perinatol; 2023 Aug; 47(5):151790. PubMed ID: 37349189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity of the Good Practice Guidelines: The example of type 2 diabetes.
    Tudrej BV; Favard D; Vaillant-Roussel H; Pouchain D; Jaafari N; Boussageon R
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2020 Nov; 169():108459. PubMed ID: 32956744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Kalra R; Arora P; Morgan C; Hage FG; Iskandrian AE; Bajaj NS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):471-481. PubMed ID: 27484213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Primer on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Nguyen NH; Singh S
    Semin Liver Dis; 2018 May; 38(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 29871017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be reproduced.
    Stegeman I; Leeflang MMG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():161-166. PubMed ID: 32679314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.
    Junhua Z; Hongcai S; Xiumei G; Boli Z; Yaozu X; Hongbo C; Ming R
    J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Oct; 13(8):797-805. PubMed ID: 17983335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension.
    O'Dea RE; Lagisz M; Jennions MD; Koricheva J; Noble DWA; Parker TH; Gurevitch J; Page MJ; Stewart G; Moher D; Nakagawa S
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Oct; 96(5):1695-1722. PubMed ID: 33960637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semi-Automated evidence synthesis in health psychology: current methods and future prospects.
    Marshall IJ; Johnson BT; Wang Z; Rajasekaran S; Wallace BC
    Health Psychol Rev; 2020 Mar; 14(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 31941434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.