These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39178023)

  • 1. Impacts of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Relationship, Communication, and Shared Decision-Making Between Health Care Professionals and Patients: Multistakeholder Interview Study.
    Funer F; Schneider D; Heyen NB; Aichinger H; Klausen AD; Tinnemeyer S; Liedtke W; Salloch S; Bratan T
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug; 26():e55717. PubMed ID: 39178023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology-supported shared decision-making in chronic conditions: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Vaseur RME; Te Braake E; Beinema T; d'Hollosy WON; Tabak M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2024 Jul; 124():108267. PubMed ID: 38547638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.
    Funer F; Tinnemeyer S; Liedtke W; Salloch S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Oct; 25(1):107. PubMed ID: 39375660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating patient perspectives in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study examining potentials within the rare disease information exchange process in practice.
    Babac A; von Friedrichs V; Litzkendorf S; Zeidler J; Damm K; Graf von der Schulenburg JM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Sep; 19(1):188. PubMed ID: 31533712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.
    Ackerhans S; Huynh T; Kaiser C; Schultz C
    Implement Sci; 2024 Feb; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 38347525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework Across Implementation Stages to Identify Key Strategies to Facilitate Clinical Decision Support System Integration Within a Large Metropolitan Health Service: Interview and Focus Group Study.
    Fernando M; Abell B; McPhail SM; Tyack Z; Tariq A; Naicker S
    JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Oct; 12():e60402. PubMed ID: 39419497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinician perspectives on clinical decision support systems in lung cancer: Implications for shared decision-making.
    Ankolekar A; van der Heijden B; Dekker A; Roumen C; De Ruysscher D; Reymen B; Berlanga A; Oberije C; Fijten R
    Health Expect; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1342-1351. PubMed ID: 35535474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
    Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternity healthcare professionals' experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study.
    Hardman K; Davies A; Demetri A; Clayton G; Bakhbakhi D; Birchenall K; Barnfield S; Fraser A; Burden C; McGuinness S; Miller R; Merriel A
    BMJ Open; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e080961. PubMed ID: 38684269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors determining the adherence to antimicrobial guidelines and the adoption of computerised decision support systems by physicians: A qualitative study in three European hospitals.
    Catho G; Centemero NS; Catho H; Ranzani A; Balmelli C; Landelle C; Zanichelli V; Huttner BD;
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104233. PubMed ID: 32736330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospectively investigating the impact of AI onshared decision-making in post kidney transplant care (PRIMA-AI): protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study among patients, their support persons and treating physicians at a tertiary care centre.
    Sassi Z; Eickmann S; Roller R; Osmanodja B; Burchardt A; Samhammer D; Dabrock P; Möller S; Budde K; Herrmann A
    BMJ Open; 2024 Oct; 14(10):e081318. PubMed ID: 39353696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers.
    Lugtenberg M; Weenink JW; van der Weijden T; Westert GP; Kool RB
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Oct; 15():82. PubMed ID: 26459233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.
    Liberati EG; Ruggiero F; Galuppo L; Gorli M; González-Lorenzo M; Maraldi M; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Scaratti G; Kwag KH; Vespignani R; Moja L
    Implement Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(1):113. PubMed ID: 28915822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semistructured interviews regarding patients' perceptions of Choosing Wisely and shared decision-making: an Australian study.
    Allen J; King R; Goergen SK; Melder A; Neeman N; Hadley A; Hutchinson AM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e031831. PubMed ID: 31467057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of computerized decision support systems in Italian hospitals: a grounded theory study].
    Liberati EG; Galuppo L; Gorli M; Maraldi M; Ruggiero F; Capobussi M; Banzi R; Kwag K; Scaratti G; Nanni O; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Cimminiello C; Bosio M; Mangia M; Moja L
    Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Apr; 106(4):180-91. PubMed ID: 25959891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.
    Fredriksson M; Holmström IK; Höglund AT; Fleron E; Mattebo M
    Reprod Health; 2024 Jul; 21(1):97. PubMed ID: 38956635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Integration of Clinical Decision Support Systems Into Telemedicine for Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care Settings: Scoping Review.
    Wiwatkunupakarn N; Aramrat C; Pliannuom S; Buawangpong N; Pinyopornpanish K; Nantsupawat N; Mallinson PAC; Kinra S; Angkurawaranon C
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jun; 25():e45944. PubMed ID: 37379066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of computerized clinical decision support systems in specialty hospitals: protocol for a qualitative cross-sectional study.
    Moja L; Liberati EG; Galuppo L; Gorli M; Maraldi M; Nanni O; Rigon G; Ruggieri P; Ruggiero F; Scaratti G; Vaona A; Kwag KH
    Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():105. PubMed ID: 25163794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shared decision making for patients with kidney failure to improve end-of-life care: Development of the DESIRE intervention.
    Buur LE; Bekker HL; Søndergaard H; Kannegaard M; Madsen JK; Khatir DS; Finderup J
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 Aug; 33(9):3498-3512. PubMed ID: 38716825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction of Medical Professionals With Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review.
    Knop M; Weber S; Mueller M; Niehaves B
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 9(1):e28639. PubMed ID: 35323118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.