These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39183533)

  • 1. Neural Decoding of the Speech Envelope: Effects of Intelligibility and Spectral Degradation.
    MacIntyre AD; Carlyon RP; Goehring T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241266316. PubMed ID: 39183533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users.
    Somers B; Verschueren E; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Feb; 16(1):016003. PubMed ID: 30444216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of stimulus intensity on neural envelope tracking.
    Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108175. PubMed ID: 33494033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural envelope tracking as a measure of speech understanding in cochlear implant users.
    Verschueren E; Somers B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():23-31. PubMed ID: 30580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection.
    Das N; Biesmans W; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056014. PubMed ID: 27618842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical correlates of speech intelligibility measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
    Lawrence RJ; Wiggins IM; Anderson CA; Davies-Thompson J; Hartley DEH
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():53-64. PubMed ID: 30292959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of acoustic periodicity and intelligibility on the neural oscillations in response to speech.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():173-181. PubMed ID: 27939190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Are you even listening?' - EEG-based decoding of absolute auditory attention to natural speech.
    Roebben A; Heintz N; Geirnaert S; Francart T; Bertrand A
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Jun; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 38834062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural speech tracking shifts from the syllabic to the modulation rate of speech as intelligibility decreases.
    Schmidt F; Chen YP; Keitel A; Rösch S; Hannemann R; Serman M; Hauswald A; Weisz N
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Nov; 60(11):e14362. PubMed ID: 37350379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two stages of speech envelope tracking in human auditory cortex modulated by speech intelligibility.
    Xu N; Zhao B; Luo L; Zhang K; Shao X; Luan G; Wang Q; Hu W; Wang Q
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Feb; 33(5):2215-2228. PubMed ID: 35695785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward Decoding Selective Attention From Single-Trial EEG Data in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Nogueira W; Cosatti G; Schierholz I; Egger M; Mirkovic B; Buchner A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 67(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 30932825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG decoding of the target speaker in a cocktail party scenario: considerations regarding dynamic switching of talker location.
    Teoh ES; Lalor EC
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Jun; 16(3):036017. PubMed ID: 30836345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sleep Disrupts High-Level Speech Parsing Despite Significant Basic Auditory Processing.
    Makov S; Sharon O; Ding N; Ben-Shachar M; Nir Y; Zion Golumbic E
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7772-7781. PubMed ID: 28626013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical linear encoding and decoding of sounds: Similarities and differences between naturalistic speech and music listening.
    Simon A; Bech S; Loquet G; Østergaard J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 59(8):2059-2074. PubMed ID: 38303522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalizable EEG Encoding Models with Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.
    Desai M; Holder J; Villarreal C; Clark N; Hoang B; Hamilton LS
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(43):8946-8962. PubMed ID: 34503996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility.
    Kösem A; Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120040. PubMed ID: 36935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.