219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3918715)
1. Prometheus the impostor.
Laor N
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Mar; 290(6469):681-4. PubMed ID: 3918715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific fraud. The system defends itself.
David P
Nature; 1983 Jun 2-8; 303(5916):369. PubMed ID: 6855889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraud in science.
Altman L; Melcher L
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jun; 286(6383):2003-6. PubMed ID: 6409204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
Woolf PK
JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Science fraud--a review of Broad and Wade: Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science.
Horne RA
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 1983; 15(5):365-7. PubMed ID: 6675031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fraud in science: how much, how serious?
Woolf P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Oct; 11(5):9-14. PubMed ID: 7309502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The process of publication.
Koshland DE
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A view of misconduct in science.
Racker E
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientists and lawyers look at fraud in science.
Wrather J
Science; 1987 Nov; 238(4828):813-4. PubMed ID: 3672128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Allocating credit and blame in science.
Chubin DE
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraudulent research in science: the responsibility of the peer reviewer.
MacDermott RP
Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1747796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deniers of the truth.
Dixon B
Sciences (New York); 1984; 24(1):23-24, 26. PubMed ID: 11654885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
Broad WJ; Wade N
Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences.
Davis RD
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fraud and the fabric of science.
Lewin B
Cell; 1989 Jun; 57(5):699-700. PubMed ID: 2720784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Fraud in biomedical literature].
Vucković-Dekić L
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2006 May; 134 Suppl 1():50-6. PubMed ID: 16796165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fraud in biomedical science.
Satyanarayana K
Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 1304290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Lies, damned lies, and science -- BBC2 Horizon: "The Betrayers," 13 Mar 1995.
Wilmshurst P
BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):747. PubMed ID: 11644676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
