BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3918715)

  • 21. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fraud in science: the burden of proof.
    Lewin B
    Cell; 1987 Jan; 48(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 3791409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Random audit of papers proposed.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Nov; 242(4879):657-8. PubMed ID: 3187510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
    Birch AJ
    Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The elusive target: truth in scientific reporting. Comments on error, self-delusion, deceit, and fraud.
    Szilagyi DE
    J Vasc Surg; 1984 Mar; 1(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 6384563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dealing with alleged fraud in medical research.
    Grouse LD
    JAMA; 1982 Oct; 248(13):1637-8. PubMed ID: 7109189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How far do you trust your colleagues?
    Neufeld A
    New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bias and fraud in medical research: a review.
    Pollock AV; Evans M
    J R Soc Med; 1985 Nov; 78(11):937-40. PubMed ID: 3906120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
    Silverman S
    Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Editors and auditors.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing.
    Mavrogenis AF; Panagopoulos GN; Megaloikonomos PD; Panagopoulos VN; Mauffrey C; Quaile A; Scarlat MM
    Orthopedics; 2018 Mar; 41(2):e176-e183. PubMed ID: 29377051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fraud in medicine.
    Lock S
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Feb; 296(6619):376-7. PubMed ID: 3125906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigator labeled fraud has last published word: 'I'm sorry.
    Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11645491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
    University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
    Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cheating in science and publishing.
    Altman LK
    CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science.
    Petersdorf RG
    Ann Intern Med; 1986 Feb; 104(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 3946954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
    Mishkin B
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An analysis of the demarcation problem in science and its application to therapeutic touch theory.
    Newbold D; Roberts J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 18021160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.