These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3918751)

  • 1. Medicolegal. What should a doctor tell?
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Mar; 290(6470):780-1. PubMed ID: 3918751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Mar; 288(6419):802-3. PubMed ID: 6423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What should a doctor tell?
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Aug; 289(6440):325-6. PubMed ID: 6430460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doctor's duty to inform patient of substantial or special risks when offering treatment.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1985 Mar; 1(8427):528-30. PubMed ID: 2857897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Britain can't afford informed consent.
    Schwartz R; Grubb A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Aug; 15(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 4055351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Informed consent" and disclosure of risks in medical treatment: some recent developments.
    Harding AJ
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1987 Apr; 16(2):375-9. PubMed ID: 3688819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Sidaway case.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1985 Mar; 1(8430):709. PubMed ID: 11644446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent ten years later: the impact of Reibl v. Hughes.
    Robertson G
    Can Bar Rev; 1991 Sep; 70(3):423-47. PubMed ID: 12211262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
    Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
    Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Physician's errors--legal advise for physicians accused of malpractice].
    Arndt M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Jan; 146(5):25-6, 28-9. PubMed ID: 15035413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent and the law--an English legal perspective.
    Hassan M
    Dig Dis; 2008; 26(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 18600010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent update for Louisiana. Reducing the risk of malpractice suits.
    Palmisano DJ; Lauve R
    J La State Med Soc; 1994 Sep; 146(9):399-401. PubMed ID: 7996036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The law of informed consent: from "doctor is right" to "patient has rights".
    Kurtz SF
    Syracuse Law Rev; 2000; 50(4):1243-60. PubMed ID: 16528861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding malpractice claims for lack of informed consent.
    Hirsh BD
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10119379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Indemnification of prejudice in matters surgical. The position of law and practice].
    Esper C
    Chirurgie; 1989; 115(9):600-5; discussion 605-7. PubMed ID: 2642146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.