These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39190660)
1. Bidirectional gated recurrent unit network model can generate future visual field with variable number of input elements. Lee J; Park K; Kim H; Moon S; Kim J; Jin S; Lee S; Lee J PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0307498. PubMed ID: 39190660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual field prediction using a deep bidirectional gated recurrent unit network model. Kim H; Lee J; Moon S; Kim S; Kim T; Jin SW; Kim JL; Shin J; Lee SU; Jang G; Hu Y; Park JR Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11154. PubMed ID: 37429862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss. Lee JM; Cirineo N; Ramanathan M; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Morales E; Coleman AL; Caprioli J Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 24200229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data Preprocessing and Augmentation Improved Visual Field Prediction of Recurrent Neural Network with Multi-Central Datasets. Park JR; Kim S; Kim T; Jin SW; Kim JL; Shin J; Lee SU; Jang G; Hu Y; Lee JW Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):978-991. PubMed ID: 37231880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual Field Prediction using Recurrent Neural Network. Park K; Kim J; Lee J Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8385. PubMed ID: 31182763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavior of visual field index in advanced glaucoma. Rao HL; Senthil S; Choudhari NS; Mandal AK; Garudadri CS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):307-12. PubMed ID: 23233259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Central Field Index Versus Visual Field Index for Central Visual Function in Stable Glaucoma. Rao A; Padhy D; Mudunuri H; Roy AK; Sarangi SP; Das G J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27636596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of the statpac visual field index. Artes PH; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Heckler L; Sharpe GP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4030-8. PubMed ID: 21467169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance. Pham AT; Ramulu PY; Boland MV; Yohannan J Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1417-1425. PubMed ID: 33798655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Prediction Performance of Glaucoma Progression Using a 2-Dimensional Continuous-Time Hidden Markov Model with Structural and Functional Measurements. Song Y; Ishikawa H; Wu M; Liu YY; Lucy KA; Lavinsky F; Liu M; Wollstein G; Schuman JS Ophthalmology; 2018 Sep; 125(9):1354-1361. PubMed ID: 29571832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forecasting future Humphrey Visual Fields using deep learning. Wen JC; Lee CS; Keane PA; Xiao S; Rokem AS; Chen PP; Wu Y; Lee AY PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214875. PubMed ID: 30951547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep learning model to predict visual field in central 10° from optical coherence tomography measurement in glaucoma. Hashimoto Y; Asaoka R; Kiwaki T; Sugiura H; Asano S; Murata H; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Miki A; Mori K; Ikeda Y; Kanamoto T; Yamagami J; Inoue K; Tanito M; Yamanishi K Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 105(4):507-513. PubMed ID: 32593978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Cataract Opacity Type and Glaucoma Severity on Visual Field Index. Chung HJ; Choi JH; Lee YC; Kim SY Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 27214250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study. Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma. Thulasidas M; Patyal S J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Many Visual Fields Are Required to Precisely Predict Future Test Results in Glaucoma Patients When Using Different Trend Analyses? Taketani Y; Murata H; Fujino Y; Mayama C; Asaoka R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):4076-82. PubMed ID: 26114484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma. Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients. Raman P; Khy Ching Y; Sivagurunathan PD; Ramli N; Mohd Khalid KH J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Relationship between visual field index and visual field morphological stages of glaucoma and their diagnostic value]. Hou XR; Qin JY; Ren ZQ Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 53(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 28260358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Central 10-degree visual field change following non-penetrating deep sclerectomy in severe and end-stage glaucoma: preliminary results. Leleu I; Penaud B; Blumen-Ohana E; Rodallec T; Adam R; Laplace O; Akesbi J; Nordmann JP Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 256(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 29862428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]