These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3919194)
1. Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids. Paris JJ; Reardon FE JAMA; 1985 Apr; 253(15):2243-5. PubMed ID: 3919194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fashion and freedom: when artificial feeding should be withdrawn. Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1985 Jun; 75(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 3923847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The removal of Mr. Herbert's feeding tube. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):13-6. PubMed ID: 6417049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonfeeding: lawful killing in CA, homicide in NJ. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):19-20. PubMed ID: 11644094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients? Lo B; Dornbrand L Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients? Emanuel EJ Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barber v. Superior Court of State of California; Nejdl v. Superior Court of State of California. California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2 Wests Calif Report; 1983 Oct; 195():484-94. PubMed ID: 11648259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The death of Clarence Herbert: withdrawing care is not murder. Lo B Ann Intern Med; 1984 Aug; 101(2):248-51. PubMed ID: 6588774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983). Crook RR Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case. Nevins MA J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Withholding and withdrawing treatment: the role of the criminal law. Glantz LH Law Med Health Care; 1987-1988 Winter; 15(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 3452703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill? Emanuel EJ Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8577):106-8. PubMed ID: 2891943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal aspects of withdrawing nourishment. Horan DJ; Grant ER J Leg Med; 1984 Dec; 5(4):595-632. PubMed ID: 6394680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law. Jarrett C Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When burdens of feeding outweigh benefits. Paris JJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 3082800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983). Chrisman JP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia. Cantor NL Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do feeding tubes have more rights than patients? Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3082798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]