These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39198420)

  • 1. Abnormal low-magnitude seismicity preceding large-magnitude earthquakes.
    Girona T; Drymoni K
    Nat Commun; 2024 Aug; 15(1):7429. PubMed ID: 39198420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Were changes in stress state responsible for the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquakes?
    Nanjo KZ
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):3082. PubMed ID: 32555220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Premonitory patterns of seismicity months before a large earthquake: five case histories in Southern California.
    Keilis-Borok VI; Shebalin PN; Zaliapin IV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Dec; 99(26):16562-7. PubMed ID: 12482945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake slip distribution controlled by fault geometry inherited from Independence dike swarm.
    Nevitt JM; Brooks BA; Hardebeck JL; Aagaard BT
    Nat Commun; 2023 Mar; 14(1):1546. PubMed ID: 36941244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Months-long seismicity transients preceding the 2023 M
    Kwiatek G; Martínez-Garzón P; Becker D; Dresen G; Cotton F; Beroza GC; Acarel D; Ergintav S; Bohnhoff M
    Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7534. PubMed ID: 38016987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scale dependence in earthquake phenomena and its relevance to earthquake prediction.
    Aki K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3740-7. PubMed ID: 11607659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study in Natural Time of Geoelectric Field and Seismicity Changes Preceding the M
    Sarlis NV; Skordas ES
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cascading elastic perturbation in Japan due to the 2012 M w 8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake.
    Delorey AA; Chao K; Obara K; Johnson PA
    Sci Adv; 2015 Oct; 1(9):e1500468. PubMed ID: 26601289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.
    Ross ZE; Idini B; Jia Z; Stephenson OL; Zhong M; Wang X; Zhan Z; Simons M; Fielding EJ; Yun SH; Hauksson E; Moore AW; Liu Z; Jung J
    Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6463):346-351. PubMed ID: 31624209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reports on progress in physics the complex dynamics of earthquake fault systems: new approaches to forecasting and nowcasting of earthquakes.
    Rundle JB; Stein S; Donnellan A; Turcotte DL; Klein W; Saylor C
    Rep Prog Phys; 2021 May; 84(7):. PubMed ID: 33857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seismicity pattern changes before the M = 4.8 Aeolian Archipelago (Italy) earthquake of August 16, 2010.
    Gambino S; Laudani A; Mangiagli S
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():531212. PubMed ID: 24511288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nucleation process of the 2011 northern Nagano earthquake from nearby seismic observations.
    Shimojo K; Enescu B; Yagi Y; Takeda T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8143. PubMed ID: 33863922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum of the order parameter fluctuations of seismicity before major earthquakes in Japan.
    Sarlis NV; Skordas ES; Varotsos PA; Nagao T; Kamogawa M; Tanaka H; Uyeda S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110(34):13734-8. PubMed ID: 23918353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermediate- and long-term earthquake prediction.
    Sykes LR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3732-9. PubMed ID: 11607658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rare Occurrences of Non-cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California.
    Moutote L; Marsan D; Lengliné O; Duputel Z
    Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Apr; 48(7):e2020GL091757. PubMed ID: 34219839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity.
    Luginbuhl M; Rundle JB; Turcotte DL
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 Nov; 377(2136):. PubMed ID: 30478209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatiotemporal Variations of the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution in the 2019
    Sardeli E; Michas G; Pavlou K; Vallianatos F
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Dec; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 38136492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield.
    Taira T; Silver PG; Niu F; Nadeau RM
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):636-9. PubMed ID: 19794490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Catalogue Lead Time on Medium-Term Earthquake Forecasting with Application to New Zealand Data.
    Rhoades DA; J Rastin S; Christophersen A
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Nov; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 33287032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma.
    Zhai G; Shirzaei M; Manga M; Chen X
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Aug; 116(33):16228-16233. PubMed ID: 31358640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.