These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39205725)

  • 1. Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Endplate Dimensions in the Indian Population and Their Correlation With Cage Placement/Length in Diverse Lumbar Fusion Techniques.
    Pisal T; Deshmukh A; Agrawal R; Gurnani S; Barosani A
    Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e65631. PubMed ID: 39205725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Length of Lumbar Interbody Cage Using Radiological Measurements of Chinese Endplates and the Apophyseal Ring.
    Sun C; Wang H; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e1204-e1213. PubMed ID: 29886299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI-Based Morphometric Study Regarding Operative Windows of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Indian Population.
    Kaul R; Kumar K; Jeyaraman M; Goswami B; Choudhary MC; Chhabra HS; Kumar S
    Indian J Orthop; 2021 Jul; 55(Suppl 2):366-373. PubMed ID: 34306549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Case-control study on endplate injury of lumbar spine with two different intervertebral fusion methods].
    Zeng ZY; Wu HF; Fan SY; Fan SW; Fang XQ; Zhao X; Song YX; Yu W; Pei F; Song GH
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 Oct; 35(10):933-42. PubMed ID: 36280409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do expandable cage size and number of cages matter in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1? A comparative biomechanical analysis using finite element modeling.
    Bakhaidar M; Harinathan B; Banurekha Devaraj K; Yoganandan N; Shabani S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Aug; 41(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 38788233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
    Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Dec; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Li SB; Mei SQ; Xu WB; Fang XQ; Fan SW; Huang LB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 37211932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Cages.
    Buckland AJ; Proctor DJ
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38274152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of surgical outcomes between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).
    Chung HW; Lee HD; Jeon CH; Chung NS
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 209():106901. PubMed ID: 34464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the location of intervertebral cages during oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery to achieve sagittal correction.
    Shiga Y; Orita S; Inage K; Sato J; Fujimoto K; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Kubota G; Yamauchi K; Eguchi Y; Inoue M; Kinoshita H; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Hynes R; Furuya T; Koda M; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
    Spine Surg Relat Res; 2017; 1(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 31440634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphometric MRI Imaging Study of the Corridor for the Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique at L1-L5.
    Julian Li JX; Mobbs RJ; Phan K
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e678-e685. PubMed ID: 29294391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to Choose Surgical Corridor in Left Oblique Approach Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the L5-S1 Segment: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Liu F; Liu Y; Gu Z; Zhao Z; Gao Y; Lu K; Sun X
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e730-e737. PubMed ID: 38195028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical changes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion with different fixation techniques in degenerative spondylolisthesis lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Tao EX; Zhang RJ; Zhang B; Wang JQ; Zhou LP; Shen CL
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Aug; 25(1):664. PubMed ID: 39182026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of stand-alone lumbar interbody cages versus 360° constructs: an in vitro and finite element investigation.
    Kiapour A; Massaad E; Joukar A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Goel VK; Shin JH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Jun; 36(6):928-936. PubMed ID: 34952510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Endplate Morphology on Cage Subsidence in Patients With Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF).
    Hu Z; He D; Gao J; Zeng Z; Jiang C; Ni W; Yik JHN; Zhao X; Fan S
    Global Spine J; 2023 Jan; 13(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 33685261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paired cylindrical interbody cage fit and facetectomy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population.
    Wong HK; Goh JC; Goh PS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 11242387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes.
    Miscusi M; Trungu S; Ricciardi L; Forcato S; Ramieri A; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E14. PubMed ID: 32871565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.
    Mobbs RJ; Phan K; Malham G; Seex K; Rao PJ
    J Spine Surg; 2015 Dec; 1(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 27683674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.