These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39212583)

  • 1. Are the Reference Values for the Provocative Concentration of Methacholine Appropriate for Children?
    Coates AL; Reyna ME; Doyle CC; Nagel MW
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2024 Oct; 37(5):220-224. PubMed ID: 39212583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
    Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
    Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.
    Blais CM; Cockcroft DW; Veilleux J; Boulay MÈ; Boulet LP; Gauvreau GM; Scime TX; Watson RM; O'Byrne PM; Davis BE
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2018 Apr; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 28813613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.
    El-Gammal AI; Killian KJ; Scime TX; Beaudin S; Schlatman A; Cockcroft DW; Gauvreau GM
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 25871542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study to investigate the use of a breath-actuated, small-volume, pneumatic nebulizer for the delivery of methacholine chloride bronchoprovocation agent.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Bates SL; Doyle CC
    Respir Care; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12556261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.
    Prieto L; Lopez V; Llusar R; Rojas R; Marin J
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 18625670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a Viral Filter to Reduce Exposure to Exhaled Aerosol Does Not Affect Methacholine Dose Delivery During Bronchoprovocation Testing.
    Subat YW; Meyer TJ; Torgerud KD; Lim KG; Scanlon PD; Niven AS
    Respir Care; 2022 Aug; 67(8):899-905. PubMed ID: 35610032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardizing dose in dosimetric bronchial challenge tests.
    Malmberg LP; Kauppi P; Mäkelä MJ
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):903-906. PubMed ID: 29345046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.
    Lexmond AJ; Hagedoorn P; Frijlink HW; de Boer AH
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2013 Dec; 26(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23509936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Wanger J; Cockcroft DW; Culver BH; ; Diamant Z; Gauvreau G; Hall GL; Hallstrand TS; Horvath I; de Jongh FHC; Joos G; Kaminsky DA; Laube BL; Leuppi JD; Sterk PJ
    Eur Respir J; 2017 May; 49(5):. PubMed ID: 28461290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
    Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
    Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
    Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methacholine challenge methods.
    Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):678-680. PubMed ID: 18842907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose vs concentration in methacholine challenge.
    Donado CD
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):598. PubMed ID: 17601278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breathing pattern variability during bronchial histamine and methacholine challenges in asthmatics.
    Strömberg NO; Gustafsson PM
    Respir Med; 1996 May; 90(5):287-96. PubMed ID: 9499813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardization of methacholine inhalation challenge.
    Sekerel BE; Saraçlar Y; Tuncer A; Adalioğlu G; Cetinkaya F
    Turk J Pediatr; 1997; 39(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 9223913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of particle size on measurement of airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.
    Naji N; Keung E; Beaudin S; Kane J; Killian KJ; Gauvreau GM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2013 May; 110(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 23622007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.