These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli. Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants. Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential stream segregation with bilateral cochlear implants. Wijetillake AA; van Hoesel RJM; Cowan R Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107812. PubMed ID: 31630083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users. Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences. Fan Y; Gifford RH Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners. Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of multi-electrode configuration on sensitivity to interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear-implant users. Kan A; Jones HG; Litovsky RY J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3826-33. PubMed ID: 26723337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users. Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners. Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. Kan A; Stoelb C; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2923-36. PubMed ID: 24116428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]