These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39215517)

  • 41. Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.
    Won JH; Jones GL; Drennan WR; Jameyson EM; Rubinstein JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2088-97. PubMed ID: 21973363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of Channel Envelope Synchrony on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):e199-206. PubMed ID: 25738574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
    Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Tejani VD; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):50. PubMed ID: 28147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences.
    Noel VA; Eddington DK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2314-28. PubMed ID: 23556598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of selective stimulation of apical electrodes on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant recipients.
    De Groote E; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Macherey O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Sep; 156(3):2060-2076. PubMed ID: 39345135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
    Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1479-90. PubMed ID: 20329848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.
    Duran SI; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3849-55. PubMed ID: 23231115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mapping procedures can produce non-centered auditory images in bilateral cochlear implantees.
    Goupell MJ; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL101-7. PubMed ID: 23363188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
    Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.