181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3921574)
1. Occlusive wound dressings to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection.
Mertz PM; Marshall DA; Eaglstein WH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1985 Apr; 12(4):662-8. PubMed ID: 3921574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusive dressings. Does dressing type influence the growth of common bacterial pathogens?
Marshall DA; Mertz PM; Eaglstein WH
Arch Surg; 1990 Sep; 125(9):1136-9. PubMed ID: 2119166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semipermeable occlusive dressings. Effects on growth of pathogenic bacteria and reepithelialization of superficial wounds.
Katz S; McGinley K; Leyden JJ
Arch Dermatol; 1986 Jan; 122(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 3079992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Controlling methicillin resistant Staphyloccocus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections with a novel biomaterial.
Martineau L; Davis SC; Peng HT; Hung A
J Invest Surg; 2007; 20(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 17710602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Silver dressings augment the ability of negative pressure wound therapy to reduce bacteria in a contaminated open fracture model.
Stinner DJ; Waterman SM; Masini BD; Wenke JC
J Trauma; 2011 Jul; 71(1 Suppl):S147-50. PubMed ID: 21795872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barrier and antibacterial properties of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate-derived wound treatment films.
Mertz PM; Davis SC; Cazzaniga AL; Drosou A; Eaglstein WH
J Cutan Med Surg; 2003; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12362261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local control of polymicrobial infections via a dual antibiotic delivery system.
Tennent DJ; Shiels SM; Jennings JA; Haggard WO; Wenke JC
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 13(1):53. PubMed ID: 29544509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wound infection under occlusive dressings.
Hutchinson JJ; Lawrence JC
J Hosp Infect; 1991 Feb; 17(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 1674265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Povidone-iodine in polyethylene oxide hydrogel dressing. Effect on multiplication of Staphylococcus aureus in partial-thickness wounds.
Mertz PM; Marshall DA; Kuglar MA
Arch Dermatol; 1986 Oct; 122(10):1133-8. PubMed ID: 3767400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hygiene and wound bacteriology].
Fromantin I
Soins; 2006 Oct; (709):19-20, 22. PubMed ID: 17111861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Chronic wound infections: the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
Serra R; Grande R; Butrico L; Rossi A; Settimio UF; Caroleo B; Amato B; Gallelli L; de Franciscis S
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2015 May; 13(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 25746414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histopathological comparisons of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa experimental infected porcine burn wounds.
Chaney SB; Ganesh K; Mathew-Steiner S; Stromberg P; Roy S; Sen CK; Wozniak DJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 May; 25(3):541-549. PubMed ID: 28466497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds.
Fazli M; Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Jørgensen B; Andersen AS; Krogfelt KA; Givskov M; Tolker-Nielsen T
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):4084-9. PubMed ID: 19812273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces pseudomonas wound contamination more than Staphylococcus aureus.
Lalliss SJ; Stinner DJ; Waterman SM; Branstetter JG; Masini BD; Wenke JC
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Sep; 24(9):598-602. PubMed ID: 20736802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of a semiocclusive dressing on the microbial population in superficial wounds.
Mertz PM; Eaglstein WH
Arch Surg; 1984 Mar; 119(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 6365033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes in the microflora of burn wounds after local treatment].
Perekhrestenko PM; Nam L; Litovchenko PP; Keĭsevich LV
Klin Khir (1962); 1991; (3):24-5. PubMed ID: 1906124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection].
Zou XH; Zhu YP; Ren GQ; Li GC; Zhang J; Zou LJ; Feng ZB; Li BH
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 33(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 28219141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
Martineau L; Shek PN
Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multifunctional Antimicrobial Nanofiber Dressings Containing ε-Polylysine for the Eradication of Bacterial Bioburden and Promotion of Wound Healing in Critically Colonized Wounds.
Mayandi V; Wen Choong AC; Dhand C; Lim FP; Aung TT; Sriram H; Dwivedi N; Periayah MH; Sridhar S; Fazil MHUT; Goh ETL; Orive G; W Beuerman R; Barkham TMS; Loh XJ; Liang ZX; Barathi VA; Ramakrishna S; Chong SJ; Verma NK; Lakshminarayanan R
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):15989-16005. PubMed ID: 32172559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
